首页> 外文期刊>Global Society >The Human Security Tale of Two Europes
【24h】

The Human Security Tale of Two Europes

机译:两个欧洲的人类安全故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

If the concept of human security is to be meaningful, it must be applicable to any region, developing or developed. Such was the point of departure for authors of two reports on Western and Eastern Europe that were commissioned by UNESCO as part of a series of regional reports aimed at detailing the human security situations in different regions. The present article, compiled by the co-authors of both reports, summarises the reports and critically revisits this premise. By exploring the notion that human security varies according to national, regional and local settings, thus gaining meaning from the context in which the framework is applied, it poses a number of critical questions about the universality of the concept of human security. It argues for a supple concept of human security capable of identifying vulnerabilities in a variety of settings and adapting legitimate responses to them. By exploring the applicability of human security in Eastern and Western Europe it sets out to test the limits of the concept and to contribute to ongoing debate about “broad” and “narrow” conceptions of human security and addresses the criticism of the concept as ideologically skewed. The paper first addresses the subjective question of what human security means in the Western and Eastern European contexts before outlining in broad terms the objective question of what is concretely taking place in Europe. It concludes by suggesting that human security actually lends itself equally to the developed world where mid- or large-scale physical violence is less common as a source of insecurity, concluding that many of the threats faced are of similar nature, if of varying degrees of severity.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2010.508334
机译:如果要使人的安全概念有意义,它就必须适用于任何地区,无论是发展中的还是发达的。这是教科文组织委托编写的关于西欧和东欧的两份报告的作者的出发点,这是一系列旨在详细说明不同地区人类安全状况的区域报告的一部分。由两个报告的合著者撰写的本文总结了这些报告,并严格地重新审视了这一前提。通过探索人类安全根据国家,地区和地方环境而变化的概念,从而从该框架的应用背景中获得意义,它提出了有关人类安全概念的普遍性的许多关键问题。它主张一种柔和的人类安全概念,能够识别各种环境中的漏洞并对其做出合理的响应。通过探索人类安全在东欧和西欧的适用性,它着手检验这一概念的局限性,并为正在进行的有关“广泛”和“狭义”的人类安全概念的辩论做出贡献,并解决批评问题。意识形态上的偏见。本文首先讨论了人类安全在西欧和东欧背景下的主观问题,然后从广义上概述了欧洲正在发生的客观问题。报告的结论是,人类安全实际上同样适用于发达世界,在发达世界中,中度或大规模的人身暴力是不安全的根源,因此得出结论,所面临的许多威胁具有相似的性质,即使程度不同。严重性。 -4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2010.508334

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号