首页> 外文期刊>Food microbiology >Evaluation of a hybrid in-field sampling method for the detection of pathogenic bacteria through consideration of a priori knowledge of factors related to non-random contamination
【24h】

Evaluation of a hybrid in-field sampling method for the detection of pathogenic bacteria through consideration of a priori knowledge of factors related to non-random contamination

机译:通过考虑与非随机污染有关的因素的先验知识,对用于病原菌检测的混合现场采样方法进行评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pre-harvest testing is increasingly used to enhance the microbial safety of fresh produce. Traditional sampling assumes that sample collectors have no information on potential contamination sources. Knowledge of such factors could potentially increase the effectiveness of pre-harvest sampling programs. Simulation modeling and field validation trials were used to evaluate a hybrid "Samples of Opportunity" (SOO) sampling method that included a portion of the samples based on the sampler's knowledge of risk factors in pre-harvest produce fields. Relative effectiveness of SOO sampling was compared with three traditional sampling methods. These evaluations were based on three non-random contamination scenarios. The mean detection probability of SOO is 96% higher than traditional sampling methods (p < 0.001). However, if the site of actual contamination is offset from assumed area of contamination, the detection probability of SOO sampling drops, and becomes similar or even worse than that achieved by the other sampling methods. Preliminary field validation trials indicated indeed that SOO performed better than the other three sampling methods. This study provides a mathematical approach for evaluating the effectiveness of four pre-harvest sampling methods, and suggests that having a priori knowledge of the contamination source in the field would improve effectiveness of sampling, particularly if done using a standardized protocol.
机译:收获前测试越来越多地用于增强新鲜农产品的微生物安全性。传统采样假定采样器没有潜在污染源的信息。了解这些因素可能会提高收获前采样程序的有效性。仿真建模和现场验证试验用于评估混合“机会样品”(SOO)采样方法,该方法基于采样者对收获前农产品田间风险因素的了解,包括一部分样本。将SOO抽样的相对有效性与三种传统的抽样方法进行了比较。这些评估基于三种非随机污染方案。 SOO的平均检测概率比传统采样方法高96%(p <0.001)。但是,如果实际污染的位置偏离了假定的污染区域,则SOO采样的检测概率将下降,并且与其他采样方法所达到的检测概率相似甚至更差。初步的现场验证试验确实表明,SOO的性能优于其他三种采样方法。这项研究为评估四种收获前采样方法的有效性提供了一种数学方法,并建议对现场污染源有先验知识将提高采样的有效性,特别是使用标准化协议进行采样时。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Food microbiology》 |2020年第8期|103412.1-103412.10|共10页
  • 作者

    Aixia Xu; Robert L. Buchanan;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Nutrition and Pood Science University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 USA;

    Department of Nutrition and Pood Science University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 USA Center for Food Safety and Security Systems University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Distributions; Probability; Field sampling; Leafy green vegetables;

    机译:分布;可能性;现场采样;绿叶蔬菜;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号