首页> 外文期刊>Fire Technology >FLAME: A Parametric Fire Risk Assessment Method Supporting Performance Based Approaches
【24h】

FLAME: A Parametric Fire Risk Assessment Method Supporting Performance Based Approaches

机译:火焰:支持基于性能的方法的参数火灾风险评估方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A fire risk assessment has always been a challenging task. Performance-based approaches to fire engineering have shown that risk-based decisions and fire scenarios are fundamental elements that must be considered in fire safety strategies. A correct assessment of the fire risk allows all the involved stakeholders to identify a specific strategy from among a variety of possibilities. A risk assessment is the best tool to identify comparable fire protection strategies and to measure the reduction in fire risk that can be obtained with each specific prevention and protection measure, i.e., by means of different fire safety strategies. The present paper illustrates a method that takes into account several well-known methods, even some that were developed as far back as in the early seventies. The method is named "FLAME" (Fire Risk Assessment Method for Enterprises). FLAME considers fundamental fire safety aspects instead of making use of sophisticated and time-consuming methods like CFD. FLAME uses the "Fire Safety Concept Tree", which is explained in detail in the NFPA 550 Standard, as a reference scheme. The method allows the risk to the occupants to be evaluated separately from the risk to the building. Over the years, we have tested the method considering different kinds of buildings and occupancies. We here report the results of an application of the FLAME method to hospitals and health-care facilities. Overall, about 300 compartments (overall size of about 60,000 m(2)) were analysed, including two hospitals of about 200,000 m(2)each. The results of the risk estimation with the FLAME code have been found to be coherent with Italian fire code prescriptions. About 44% of the compartments were defined as being at a Medium risk and 39% as being at a high risk (according to the Italian Fire Code). More than 60% of the hospital compartments were defined as being at a High risk. A good agreement was obtained between the RSET results with those of the method proposed in FLAME when using the current performance-based regulation criteria. The RSET estimation in FLAME considers the occupants' behaviour and the actual characteristics of the occupants in clinics or hospitals, who often have difficulties due to reduced mobility or an incapacity to understand emergency instructions.
机译:火灾风险评估一直是一个具有挑战性的任务。基于绩效的消防工程方法表明,基于风险的决定和火灾情景是必须考虑在消防安全策略中的基本要素。对火灾风险的正确评估允许所有所涉及的利益相关者从各种可能性中识别特定的策略。风险评估是识别可比的防火策略的最佳工具,并测量可以通过各种预防和保护措施获得的火灾风险的降低,即通过不同的消防安全策略。本文说明了一种考虑了几种众所周知的方法的方法,甚至一些在七十年代早期而被追溯到的一些方法。该方法名为“Flame”(企业的火灾风险评估方法)。火焰考虑基本的消防安全方面,而不是利用如CFD等精致和耗时的方法。火焰使用“消防安全概念树”,其在NFPA 550标准中详细解释,作为参考方案。该方法允许将乘员与建筑物的风险分开进行评估的风险。多年来,我们已经测试了考虑不同类型的建筑物和占用的方法。我们在此报告了对医院和医疗保健设施的火焰方法的应用结果。总体而言,分析了大约300个隔间(总体大小约为60,000米(2)),包括两家医院,每位医院约200,000米(2)。已发现具有火焰代码的风险估计结果与意大利火灾代码处方相干。约44%的隔间被定义为处于中等风险,39%处于高风险(根据意大利火灾代码)。超过60%的医院隔间被定义为高风险。使用当前基于性能的监管标准时,在RSET结果与火焰中提出的方法之间获得了良好的协议。火焰中的RSET估计考虑了居住者的行为和诊所或医院占用者的实际特征,由于移动性降低或无能力来了解紧急指令,他们往往具有困难。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号