首页> 外文期刊>Fire Safety Journal >Review and analysis of fire resistance tests of timber members in bending, tension and compression with respect to the Reduced Cross-Section Method
【24h】

Review and analysis of fire resistance tests of timber members in bending, tension and compression with respect to the Reduced Cross-Section Method

机译:减少截面法对木材构件弯曲,拉伸和压缩的耐火性测试的回顾和分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Reduced Cross-Section Method (RCSM) provides a popular method for the design of timber members exposed to fire, using an effective cross-section and mechanical properties at normal temperature. The RCSM was adopted from a single publication and was originally developed for single-span beams exposed to bending load. It has been introduced in Eurocode 5 for a large range of timber members, including columns under compression and members under tension. Recently, the applicability of the method and its extended applications were called into question on the basis of limitations and contradictions found by advanced simulations. This paper analyses a total of 153 fire resistance tests (117 members in bending, six members in compression and 30 members in tension) with respect to the RCSM. The analysis shows that (ⅰ) most of the references are of too poor quality, or are incomplete, to validate a design model, (ⅱ) results with adequate information content showed a significant deviation from the RCSM, and (ⅲ) that the RCSM may lead to a non-conservative design. For members in tension, results fit well with the RCSM, while significant deviations were found for members in compression. Members in bending show very large scatter. It is therefore recommended that the existing design approach in Eurocode 5 should be revised in order to include the results of advanced calculations and appropriate tests.
机译:减小横截面方法(RCSM)为使用火的木材构件设计提供了一种流行的方法,该方法在常温下具有有效的横截面和机械性能。 RCSM是从单一出版物中采用的,最初是为承受弯曲载荷的单跨梁而开发的。它已在Eurocode 5中引入,用于各种木材构件,包括受压的柱子和受拉的构件。最近,基于高级仿真发现的局限性和矛盾性,对该方法的适用性及其扩展应用提出了质疑。相对于RCSM,本文共分析了153个耐火测试(弯曲117个构件,压缩6个构件和拉伸30个构件)。分析表明(ⅰ)大多数参考文献的质量太差或不完整,无法验证设计模型;(ⅱ)具有足够信息内容的结果表明与RCSM有显着偏差;以及(ⅲ)RCSM可能导致非保守设计。对于受拉构件,结果与RCSM非常吻合,而受压构件则存在明显偏差。弯曲的构件显示很大的散布。因此,建议修改欧洲规范5中的现有设计方法,以包括高级计算和适当测试的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号