首页> 外文期刊>Financial history review >THE PAST MIRROR: NOTES, SURVEYS, DEBATES
【24h】

THE PAST MIRROR: NOTES, SURVEYS, DEBATES

机译:过去的镜子:笔记,调查,辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We examine the international propagation of the financial crisis of 2008, and compare it with that of the crisis of 1931. Both crises featured a flight to liquidity and safety. We argue that the collateral squeeze in the United States, which became intense after the failure of Lehman Brothers, was an important propagator in 2008; in 1931 the acceptances granted by London banks to central European borrowers propagated the crisis to the UK. In both crises, central banks' reserve management actions contributed to the liquidity crisis. And in both crises, the behaviour of creditors towards debtors, and the valuation of assets by creditors, were very important. However, there was a key difference between the two crises in the range and nature of assets that were regarded as liquid and safe: central banks in 2008, with no gold standard constraint, could liquefy illiquid assets on a much greater scale.
机译:我们研究了2008年金融危机的国际蔓延,并将其与1931年危机的蔓延进行了比较。这两次危机都表现出对流动性和安全性的逃避。我们认为,雷曼兄弟倒闭后,美国的抵押紧缩在2008年是一个重要的宣传手段;在雷曼兄弟倒闭后,这种紧迫感变得更加强烈。 1931年,伦敦银行授予中欧借款人的承兑汇票将危机传播到了英国。在这两次危机中,中央银行的储备金管理行动都导致了流动性危机。在这两次危机中,债权人对债务人的行为以及债权人对资产的估价都非常重要。但是,这两种危机在被认为具有流动性和安全性的资产的范围和性质上有一个关键区别:2008年,在没有金本位制限制的情况下,中央银行可以大规模流动非流动性资产。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号