首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal >Cochrane review: School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse
【24h】

Cochrane review: School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse

机译:科克伦评论:预防儿童性虐待的校本教育计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background nChild sexual abuse is a significant problem that requires an effective means of prevention. nnObjectives nTo assess: if school-based programmes are effective in improving knowledge about sexual abuse and self-protective behaviours; whether participation results in an increase in disclosure of sexual abuse and/or produces any harm; knowledge retention and the effect of programme type or setting. nnSearch strategy nElectronic searches of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, Dissertation Abstracts and other databases using MESH headings and text words specific for child sexual assault and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted in August 2006. nnSelection criteria nRCTs or quasi-RCTs of school-based interventions to prevent child sexual abuse compared with another intervention or no intervention. nnData collection and analysis nMeta-analyses and sensitivity analysis, using two imputed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) (0.1, 0.2), were used for four outcomes: protective behaviours, questionnaire-based knowledge, vignette-based knowledge and disclosure of abuse. Meta-analysis was not possible for retention of knowledge, likelihood of harm, or effect of programme type and setting. nnMain results nFifteen trials measuring knowledge and behaviour change as a result of school-based child sexual abuse intervention programmes were included. Over half the studies in each initial meta-analysis contained unit of analysis errors. For behaviour change, two studies had data suitable for meta-analysis; results favoured intervention (OR 6.76, 95% CI 1.44, 31.84) with moderate heterogeneity (I2=56.0%) and did not change significantly when adjustments using intraclass coefficients were made. Nine studies were included in a meta-analysis evaluating questionnaire-based knowledge. An increase in knowledge was found (SMD 0.59; 0.44, 0.74, heterogeneity (I2=66.4%). When adjusted for an ICC of 0.1 and 0.2 the results were SMD 0.6 (0.45, 0.75) and 0.57 (0.44, 0.71) respectively. Heterogeneity decreased with increasing ICC. A meta-analysis of four studies evaluating vignette-based knowledge favoured intervention (SMD 0.37 (0.18, 0.55)) with low heterogeneity (I2=0.0%) and no significant change when ICC adjustments were made. Meta-analysis of between-group differences of reported disclosures did not show a statistically significant difference. nnAuthors' conclusions nStudies evaluated in this review report significant improvements in knowledge measures and protective behaviours. Results might have differed had the true ICCs from studies been available or cluster-adjusted results been available. Several studies reported harms, suggesting a need to monitor the impact of similar interventions. Retention of knowledge should be measured beyond 3-12 months. Further investigation of the best forms of presentation and optimal age of programme delivery is required. nnPlain language summary nSchool-based programmes for preventing child sex abuse may improve knowledge and self-protective behaviours but also increase anxiety; further research is needed nChildhood sexual abuse is a serious problem for school aged children worldwide. There is no consistent definition of sexual abuse. Some studies restrict sexual abuse to instances of sexual body contact with the child, while others define sexual abuse as any sexual behaviour in a child's presence. Whatever its form, childhood sexual abuse can have a very negative impact on a child. The United Nations' Convention on the Rights of the Child states that children have the right to be protected from being hurt and mistreated, physically or mentally and the international community needs to investigate ways this can be done effectively. One widespread method used is to teach school aged children, using school-based programs, about child sexual abuse and how to protect themselves from it. It is important to know if this approach works, for how long it works and if it causes any unintended harm to children and adolescents. This is the purpose of this systematic review. nWhile this review found improvements in knowledge and protective behaviours among children who had received school-based programs, these results should be interpreted with caution. The reasons for a need for caution is that there were problems with the way that many of the original studies were analysed, children's knowledge was tested only a short time period after the program, the studies were conducted in North America and therefore may not apply to other countries and cultures, and several studies reported harms, such as increased anxiety in children. Potential harms need to be closely monitored in future studies and existing school based programs. It is difficult to know if the changes in children's knowledge and protective behaviours seen in the studies will result in prevention of child sexual abuse. As such, school-based programs should, at best, be seen as part of a community approach to the prevention of child sexual abuse.
机译:背景n儿童性虐待是一个重要问题,需要有效的预防手段。 nn目标:评估:以学校为基础的课程是否有效提高了有关性虐待和自我保护行为的知识;参与是否导致对性虐待的披露增加和/或造成任何伤害;知识保留以及程序类型或设置的影响。 nn检索策略于8月进行了电子检索,使用的是针对儿童性侵犯的MESH标题和文字,并对MEDLINE,EMBASE,PsycINFO,CINAHL,社会学摘要,学位论文摘要和其他数据库进行了电子检索,包括儿童的性侵犯和随机对照试验(RCT)。 2006年。nn选择标准与其他干预措施或无干预措施相比,以学校为基础的干预措施可预防儿童性虐待的nRCT或准RCT。 nn数据收集和分析nMeta分析和敏感性分析使用两个估算的组内相关系数(ICC)(0.1,0.2),用于四个结果:保护性行为,基于问卷的知识,基于小插图的知识和滥用的披露。荟萃分析不可能保留知识,损害的可能性或程序类型和设置的影响。 nn主要结果纳入了15项评估知识和行为变化的试验,这些试验是基于学校的儿童性虐待干预计划的结果。每个初始荟萃分析中超过一半的研究包含分析误差单位。对于行为改变,两项研究都有适合进行荟萃分析的数据。结果偏向于干预(OR 6.76,95%CI 1.44,31.84),具有中等程度的异质性(I2 = 56.0%),并且在使用类内系数进行调整时没有明显变化。一项荟萃分析评估了基于问卷的知识,其中包括九项研究。发现知识增加(SMD为0.59; 0.44、0.74,异质性(I2 = 66.4%);如果将ICC调整为0.1和0.2,则结果分别为SMD 0.6(0.45、0.75)和0.57(0.44、0.71)。异质性随ICC的增加而降低。对四项评估基于小插图的知识进行的荟萃分析偏爱干预措施(SMD 0.37(0.18,0.55)),异质性低(I2 = 0.0%),并且在进行ICC调整时无明显变化。报告披露的组间差异的分析未显示出统计学上的显着差异nn作者的结论该评价中评估的研究报告说,知识测度和保护性行为有了显着改善。如果可获得研究的真实ICC或聚类结果,结果可能会有所不同。已有一些研究报告了其危害,这表明有必要监测类似干预措施的影响,知识保留时间应在3至12个月以上进行测量。需要最佳的演示形式和最佳的计划交付年龄。 nnPlain语言摘要基于nSchool的防止儿童性虐待的程序可能会改善知识和自我保护行为,但也会增加焦虑感;需要进行进一步的研究n童年性虐待是全球学龄儿童的严重问题。对性虐待没有统一的定义。一些研究将性虐待限制为与儿童发生性身体接触,而另一些研究则将性虐待定义为儿童在场的任何性行为。无论其形式如何,儿童时期的性虐待都会对儿童产生非常不利的影响。 《联合国儿童权利公约》指出,儿童有权受到保护,免受身体或精神上的伤害和虐待,国际社会需要研究如何有效地做到这一点。一种广泛使用的方法是使用基于学校的计划,对学龄儿童进行有关儿童性虐待以及如何保护自己免受性虐待的教育。重要的是要知道这种方法是否有效,能持续多长时间以及是否会对儿童和青少年造成意外伤害。这是本系统综述的目的。 n虽然这项审查发现接受学校课程的孩子在知识和保护行为上有所改善,但应谨慎解释这些结果。需要谨慎的原因是,许多原始研究的分析方式存在问题,该计划仅在短时间内测试了儿童的知识,该研究在北美进行,因此可能不适用于其他国家和文化,一些研究报告了危害,例如儿童焦虑加剧。在未来的研究和现有的基于学校的计划中,需要密切监控潜在的危害。很难知道研究中儿童知识和保护行为的变化是否会导致预防儿童性虐待。因此,以学校为基础的计划最多应被视为社区预防儿童性虐待方法的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号