首页> 外文期刊>European Spine Journal >Ultrasound assessment of transversus abdominis muscle contraction ratio during abdominal hollowing: a useful tool to distinguish between patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls?
【24h】

Ultrasound assessment of transversus abdominis muscle contraction ratio during abdominal hollowing: a useful tool to distinguish between patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls?

机译:超声评估腹部空腹时横贯腹肌的收缩率:区分慢性下腰痛患者和健康对照者的有用工具吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Spine stabilisation exercises, in which patients are taught to preferentially activate the transversus abdominus (TrA) during “abdominal hollowing” (AH), are a popular treatment for chronic low back pain (cLBP). The present study investigated whether performance during AH differed between cLBP patients and controls to an extent that would render it useful diagnostic tool. 50 patients with cLBP (46.3 ± 12.5 years) and 50 healthy controls (43.6 ± 12.7 years) participated in this case–control study. They performed AH in hook-lying. Using M-mode ultrasound, thicknesses of TrA, and obliquus internus and externus were determined at rest and during 5 s AH (5 measures each body side). The TrA contraction-ratio (TrA-CR) (TrA contracted/rest) and the ability to sustain the contraction [standard deviation (SD) of TrA thickness during the stable phase of the hold] were investigated. There were no significant group differences for the absolute muscle thicknesses at rest or during AH, or for the SD of TrA thickness. There was a small but significant difference between the groups for TrA-CR: cLBP 1.35 ± 0.14, controls 1.44 ± 0.24 (p < 0.05). However, Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) analysis revealed a poor and non-significant ability of TrA-CR to discriminate between cLBP patients and controls on an individual basis (ROC area under the curve, 0.60 [95% CI 0.495; 0.695], p = 0.08). In the patient group, TrA-CR showed a low but significant correlation with Roland Morris score (Spearman Rho = 0.328; p = 0.02). In conclusion, the difference in group mean values for TrA-CR was small and of uncertain clinical relevance. Moreover, TrA-CR showed a poor ability to discriminate between control and cLBP subjects on an individual basis. We conclude that the TrA-CR during abdominal hollowing does not distinguish well between patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls.
机译:脊柱稳定锻炼是一种治疗慢性下腰痛(cLBP)的流行方法,在该锻炼中,患者被教导在“腹部空洞”(AH)期间优先激活横腹(TrA)。本研究调查了cLBP患者和对照在AH期间的表现是否有所不同,以使其成为有用的诊断工具。 50例cLBP患者(46.3±12.5岁)和50例健康对照(43.6±12.7岁)参加了该病例对照研究。他们在钩上表演了AH。使用M型超声,在静止和AH的5 s内确定TrA的厚度以及内斜肌和外斜肌的厚度(每侧测量5次)。研究了TrA收缩率(TrA-CR)(TrA收缩/静止)和维持收缩的能力[在保持稳定阶段TrA厚度的标准偏差(SD)]。静止或AH期间绝对肌肉厚度或TrA厚度SD均无显着组别差异。 TrA-CR组之间的差异很小但很明显:cLBP 1.35±0.14,对照组1.44±0.24(p <0.05)。但是,接收者操作员特征(ROC)分析显示TrA-CR区分cLBP患者和对照个体的能力差且不显着(曲线下的ROC面积为0.60 [95%CI 0.495; 0.695],p = 0.08)。在患者组中,TrA-CR与罗兰·莫里斯评分低而显着相关(Spearman Rho = 0.328; p = 0.02)。总之,TrA-CR组平均值的差异很小,并且临床相关性不确定。而且,TrA-CR在个体基础上区分对照和cLBP受试者的能力较弱。我们得出的结论是,在腹部空洞中的TrA-CR不能很好地区分患有慢性下腰痛的患者和健康对照组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号