首页> 外文期刊>European Planning Studies >Identifying Stakeholders' Views on Sustainable Urban Transition: Desirability, Utility and Probability Assessments of Scenarios
【24h】

Identifying Stakeholders' Views on Sustainable Urban Transition: Desirability, Utility and Probability Assessments of Scenarios

机译:确定利益相关者对可持续城市转型的观点:情景的可取性,效用和概率评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The assessment of different urban planning scenarios by stakeholders can yield important insights which, in turn, inform sustainable urban transition. Yet to gain in-depth insight, this assessment needs to be multi-faceted and should go beyond a unidimensional “most/least desired” approach. Accordingly, we use indicators that distinguish between desirability, utility and probability assessments. We compare these assessments within and between various stakeholder groups based on a set of literature-based hypotheses. We constructed six planning scenarios, systematically varied with respect to sustainability for the case study, “Erlenmatt”, a major urban redevelopment area in Switzerland. Three stakeholder groups (housing suppliers, the non-profit & public sector and housing target groups, n = 80) were investigated. The results of the statistical analyses suggest that more sustainable scenarios are preferred with respect to both their desirability and utility and that their probability is not lower than that of the other scenarios. The non-profit & public sector is the most pessimistic about the probability of a sustainable district while housing suppliers desire it less. We conclude that such detailed subjective scenario assessments can provide informative and detailed guidance for sustainable urban transition.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.713332
机译:利益相关者对不同城市规划方案的评估可以得出重要见解,进而为可持续城市转型提供信息。然而,要获得深入的见解,这种评估需要多方面的,并且应该超越一维的“最/最不希望的”方法。因此,我们使用区分可取性,效用和概率评估的指标。我们基于一组基于文献的假设,比较各个利益相关者群体内部和之间的评估。我们构建了六个规划方案,针对案例研究“ Erlenmatt”(瑞士的主要城市重建区),就可持续性而言系统地进行了变化。三个利益相关者组(房屋供应商,非营利性与公共部门和住房目标组,n = 80)进行了调查。统计分析的结果表明,就其可取性和实用性而言,更可持续的方案是可取的,并且其可能性不低于其他方案。非营利性和公共部门对可持续性地区的可能性最悲观,而住房供应商对可持续性地区的期望却更低。我们得出的结论是,这种详细的主观情景评估可以为可持续的城市转型提供有益而详尽的指导。查看全文下载全文linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多“,发布ID:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.713332

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号