首页> 外文期刊>European Planning Studies >Strategic Planning in Transition: Contested Rationalities and Spatial Logics in Twenty-First Century Danish Planning Experiments
【24h】

Strategic Planning in Transition: Contested Rationalities and Spatial Logics in Twenty-First Century Danish Planning Experiments

机译:转型中的战略规划:二十一世纪丹麦规划实验中有争议的理性和空间逻辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article, we analyse how contested transitions in planning rationalities and spatial logics have shaped the processes and outputs of recent episodes of Danish “strategic spatial planning”. The practice of “strategic spatial planning” in Denmark has undergone a concerted reorientation in the recent years as a consequence of an emerging neoliberal agenda promoting a growth-oriented planning approach emphasizing a new spatial logic of growth centres in the major cities and urban regions. The analysis, of the three planning episodes, at different subnational scales, highlights how this new style of “strategic spatial planning” with its associated spatial logics is continuously challenged by a persistent regulatory, top-down rationality of “strategic spatial planning”, rooted in spatial Keynesianism, which has long characterized the Danish approach. The findings reveal the emergence of a particularly Danish approach, retaining strong regulatory aspects. However this approach does not sit easily within the current neoliberal political climate, raising concerns of an emerging crisis of “strategic spatial planning”.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.713333
机译:在本文中,我们分析了计划合理性和空间逻辑中有争议的过渡如何影响了丹麦最近的“战略性空间规划”的过程和输出。由于新兴的新自由主义议程促进了以增长为导向的规划方法,强调了主要城市和增长中心的新空间逻辑,近年来,丹麦的“战略性空间规划”实践经历了一致的重新定位。市区。对不同国家以下规模的三个规划事件的分析强调了这种“战略性空间规划”及其相关的空间逻辑的新样式如何不断受到“战略性”的持续监管,自上而下的合理性的挑战。空间规划”,源于空间凯恩斯主义,长期以来一直是丹麦方法的特征。调查结果揭示了一种特别是丹麦方法的出现,该方法保留了强大的监管方面。然而,这种方法在当前的新自由主义政治环境中并不容易,引起了人们对“战略性空间规划”危机的担忧。查看全文下载全文“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.713333

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号