首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Social Work >Re-thinking ‘tradition’ and community development practice: integrating Derrida's ‘trace’ and Peile's ‘creative synthesis’ into a reconceptualising of ‘traditions’ and community development practice
【24h】

Re-thinking ‘tradition’ and community development practice: integrating Derrida's ‘trace’ and Peile's ‘creative synthesis’ into a reconceptualising of ‘traditions’ and community development practice

机译:重新思考“传统”和社区发展实践:将德里达的“踪迹”和皮尔的“创意综合”整合到对“传统”和社区发展实践的重新构想中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines and critiques the notion of ‘tradition’ within community development literature. Appreciatively, the paper presents a typology of how the community development literature uses the notion of tradition—as geographically-defined, methodologically-oriented and intellectually-rooted practice; and also discusses the functions of tradition as ‘inspiration’ for community work practice. Critically, the paper discusses the limits of the concept, offering a cautionary note to the potential pitfalls of a focus on tradition. It proposes Derrida's ‘trace’ to moderate tradition as ‘stagnation of practice’. Furthermore, Peile's ‘creative synthesis’ is discussed to show how ‘parts’ of, or traces of different traditions can be appraised, modified and synthesised, through a creative process, into a new ‘whole’ which appears different to the sources of its constituent parts. Finally, the paper discusses the findings of a small research project that investigates the multiple ways ‘tradition’ is used or made sense of, by a small cohort of experienced community development workers within Brisbane, Australia.View full textDownload full textKeywordsCommunity Development, Traditions, Trace, Creative Synthesis, Reflective PracticeRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691451003744358
机译:本文研究并批评了社区发展文献中的“传统”概念。令人感激的是,本文提出了一种社区发展文献如何使用传统概念的类型学,即传统的地理定义,方法论导向和知识基础实践;并且还讨论了传统作为社区工作实践的“灵感”的功能。至关重要的是,本文讨论了这一概念的局限性,对传统主义的潜在陷阱提出了警告性的提示。它提出德里达的“痕迹”以适度的传统作为“实践的停滞”。此外,对Peile的“创意综合”进行了讨论,以展示如何通过创造性过程将不同传统的“部分”或痕迹进行评估,修改和综合,形成一个新的“整体”。这似乎与其组成部分的来源不同。最后,本文讨论了一个小型研究项目的发现,该项目研究了由澳大利亚布里斯班的一小批经验丰富的社区开发人员使用或理解“传统”的多种方式。查看全文下载全文关键字社区发展,传统,跟踪,创意综合,反思性实践相关的变量add add_id :“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691451003744358

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号