首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of International Law >The Sociology of International Economic Law: Sociological Analysis of the Regulation of Regional Agreements in the World Trading System
【24h】

The Sociology of International Economic Law: Sociological Analysis of the Regulation of Regional Agreements in the World Trading System

机译:国际经济法社会学:世界贸易体系中区域协议规定的社会学分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

International economic law (IEL) is influenced by diverse theoretical approaches. This article emphasizes that international economic activity is a social phenomenon and international trade should also be conceived as a specific type of social interaction. The scarcity of sociological analysis in contemporary IEL literature does not diminish the influence of social factors that are active in the under-explored layer of the international economic arena. Sociological analysis may recast well-known dilemmas in a different manner and generate insights regarding better legal mechanisms for coping with modern challenges faced by IEL. These properties of sociological analysis are illustrated in this article, which addresses one of the most challenging dilemmas in current IEL literature: the relationship between the World Trade Organization (WTO) and regional trade agreements (RTAs). The underlying argument of this article is that the economic dimension of RTAs is overlaid with a sociological dimension. Consequently, the global/regional debate is analysed with new conceptual tools: sociological theories, mainly the structural-functional perspective, the symbolic-interactionist approach, and the social conflict perspective. The core sociological theories lead to different conceptions of IEL and different interpretations of existing WTO legal provisions regarding RTAs. This article argues that while each of the above sociological approaches underscores certain significant aspects of the global/regional debate, the symbolic-interactionist perspective should generally serve as a point of departure for law- and policy-making in this sphere. This approach suggests that the relevant WTO legal rules should be interpreted in a liberal manner.
机译:国际经济法(IEL)受多种理论方法的影响。本文强调,国际经济活动是一种社会现象,国际贸易也应被视为一种特定类型的社会互动。当代IEL文献中社会学分析的稀缺性并没有减少活跃在国际经济领域未充分探索的层面中的社会因素的影响。社会学分析可以以不同的方式重塑众所周知的困境,并产生有关更好的法律机制应对IEL所面临的现代挑战的见解。本文阐述了社会学分析的这些属性,解决了当前IEL文献中最具挑战性的难题之一:世界贸易组织(WTO)与区域贸易协定(RTA)之间的关系。本文的基本论点是,区域贸易协定的经济层面被社会层面所覆盖。因此,使用新的概念工具分析了全球/区域辩论:社会学理论,主要是结构功能观点,符号互动主义方法和社会冲突观点。核心社会学理论导致对IEL的不同概念以及对现有的WTO关于RTAs的法律规定的不同解释。本文认为,尽管上述每种社会学方法都强调了全球/区域辩论的某些重要方面,但符号互动主义的观点通常应成为该领域法律和政策制定的出发点。这种方法表明,应以一种宽松的方式来解释世贸组织的有关法律规则。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European Journal of International Law》 |2008年第2期|p.277-299|共23页
  • 作者

    Moshe Hirsch*;

  • 作者单位

    *Associate Professor, Faculty of Law and Department of International Relations, Hebrew University of Jerusalem;

    Principal Research Fellow, Centre for Energy, Petroleum, Mineral Law &

    Policy, Faculty of Law, University of Dundee. This article is based on papers presented at the NYU Institute for International Law &

    Justice Colloquium on ‘Rethinking the Table of Contents of International Law’ (April 2005) and in the Conference on ‘Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity’ held at the Hebrew University Faculty of Law (June 2006);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号