首页> 外文期刊>European journal of information systems >Adverse consequences of access to individuals' information: an analysis of perceptions and the scope of organisational influence
【24h】

Adverse consequences of access to individuals' information: an analysis of perceptions and the scope of organisational influence

机译:获取个人信息的不良后果:对观念和组织影响范围的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Organisations are highly interested in collecting and analysing customer data to enhance their service offerings and customer interaction. However, individuals increasingly fear how such practices may negatively affect them. Although previous studies have investigated individuals' concerns about information privacy practices, the adverse consequences people associate with external actors accessing their personal information remain unclear. To mitigate customers' fears, organisations need to know which adverse consequences individuals are afraid of and how to address those negative perceptions. To investigate this topic, we conducted 22 focus groups with 119 participants. We developed a comprehensive conceptualisation and categorisation of individuals' perceived adverse consequences of access to their information that includes seven types of consequences: psychological, social, career-related, physical, resource-related, prosecution-related, and freedom-related. Although individuals may limit their interactions with an organisation owing to consequences they associate with both the organisation and other actors, organisations can apply preventive and corrective mechanisms to mitigate some of these negative perceptions. However, organisations' scope of influence is limited and some fears may be mitigated only by individuals themselves or government regulation, if at all.
机译:组织对收集和分析客户数据以增强他们的服务产品和客户互动非常感兴趣。但是,人们越来越担心这种做法会对他们产生负面影响。尽管先前的研究已经调查了个人对信息隐私惯例的担忧,但是与外部行为者相关联的访问其个人信息的不良后果仍然不清楚。为了减轻客户的恐惧,组织需要知道个人担心哪些不良后果以及如何解决这些负面看法。为了调查这个话题,我们进行了22个焦点小组,共有119名参与者。我们对个人获取信息的负面后果进行了全面的概念化和分类,包括七种后果:心理,社会,与职业有关,与身体有关,与资源有关,与起诉有关和与自由有关。尽管由于与组织和其他行为者相关的后果,个人可能会限制与组织的互动,但组织可以应用预防和纠正机制来减轻其中的一些负面看法。但是,组织的影响力范围是有限的,某些恐惧只能通过个人本人或政府法规来缓解(如果有的话)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号