...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Epidemiology >Clinical validity of detecting K-ras mutations for the diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic cancer: a prospective study in a clinically-relevant spectrum of patients
【24h】

Clinical validity of detecting K-ras mutations for the diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic cancer: a prospective study in a clinically-relevant spectrum of patients

机译:检测K-ras突变在诊断外分泌型胰腺癌中的临床有效性:一项在临床相关患者中的前瞻性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The diagnostic utility of detecting K-ras mutations for the diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic cancer (EPC) has not been properly studied, and few reports have analysed a clinically relevant spectrum of patients. The objective was to evaluate the clinical validity of detecting K-ras mutations in the diagnosis of EPC in a large sample of clinically relevant patients. We prospectively identified 374 patients in whom one of the following diagnoses was suspected at hospital admission: EPC, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cysts, and cancer of the extrahepatic biliary system. Mutations in the K-ras oncogene were analysed by PCR and artificial RFLP in 212 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the K-ras mutational status for the diagnosis of EPC were 77.7% (95% CI: 69.2–84.8) and 78.0% (68.1–86.0), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was hardly modified by sex and age. In patients with either mutated K-ras or CEA > 5 ng/ml, the sensitivity and specificity were 81.0% (72.9–87.6) and 62.6% (72.9–87.6), respectively. In patients with mutated K-ras and CEA > 5 ng/ml the sensitivity was markedly reduced. In comparisons with a variety of non-EPC patient groups sensitivity and specificity were both always greater than 75%. In this clinically relevant sample of patients the sensitivity and specificity of K-ras mutations were not sufficiently high for independent diagnostic use. However, it seems premature to rule out the utility of K-ras analysis in conjunction with other genetic and ‘omics’ technologies.
机译:对K-ras突变进行诊断以诊断外分泌性胰腺癌(EPC)的诊断用途尚未得到适当研究,很少有报道对患者的临床相关光谱进行分析。目的是评估大量临床相关患者样本中检测K-ras突变在EPC诊断中的临床有效性。我们前瞻性地鉴定了374例入院时怀疑患有以下诊断之一的患者:EPC,慢性胰腺炎,胰腺囊肿和肝外胆系统癌。通过PCR和人工RFLP分析了212例患者的K-ras癌基因突变。诊断EPC的K-ras突变状态的敏感性和特异性分别为77.7%(95%CI:69.2-84.8)和78.0%(68.1-86.0)。诊断准确性几乎不受性别和年龄的影响。在突变的K-ras或CEA> 5 ng / ml的患者中,敏感性和特异性分别为81.0%(72.9-87.6)和62.6%(72.9-87.6)。在K-ras突变且CEA> 5 ng / ml的患者中,敏感性显着降低。与各种非EPC患者相比,敏感性和特异性均始终大于75%。在该患者的临床相关样本中,K-ras突变的敏感性和特异性不足以用于独立诊断。但是,将K-ras分析与其他遗传和“组学”技术结合使用的可能性似乎还为时过早。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号