首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Communication >Media Meet the Citizen: Beyond Market Mechanisms and Government Regulations
【24h】

Media Meet the Citizen: Beyond Market Mechanisms and Government Regulations

机译:媒体与公民会面:超越市场机制和政府法规

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Structural changes in the media world, including an increase in competition and commercialization, mean that the topicality and urgency of the notion of social responsibility in the media are increasing. Analogously, the discussion of the social responsibility of companies and organizations becomes a central concern in the business world and within government, as the relatively new concept of 'good governance' shows. In recent years we have seen that the absolute belief in the free market is once again under debate. Rather than a return to a controlling government as the main provider of a context in the complex 'ecology' of communication policy, possible solutions are now sought in greater responsibility for the media actors themselves (media companies and organizations, citizens, supervisory boards and commissions) and in self-regulation in the media profession. This article assesses accountability mechanisms currently in existence in the Netherlands and provides a comparative overview of interesting practices in other geographical contexts. This contribution also examines the academic reflection upon and conceptualization of such notions as social 'responsibility' and media 'accountability' in the division of labour throughout the market, the government and civil society. We are thinking of mechanisms for accountability such as a contract between the government and the broadcasters, an ombudsperson, forms of self-regulation, supervisory bodies, forms of public consultation, and the profession seeking contact with the citizens (e.g. civic journalism).
机译:媒体世界的结构性变化,包括竞争和商业化的加剧,意味着媒体中社会责任概念的话题性和紧迫性正在增加。类似地,关于公司和组织的社会责任的讨论已成为商业界和政府内部关注的焦点,正如相对较新的“善治”概念所表明的那样。近年来,我们已经看到对自由市场的绝对信念再次受到争议。现在,与其寻求控制政府作为复杂的沟通政策“生态”环境的主要提供者,不如寻求可能的解决方案,以更大的责任应对媒体参与者自身(媒体公司和组织,公民,监事会和委员会) )以及媒体行业的自我监管。本文评估了荷兰目前存在的问责机制,并提供了其他地理环境中有趣做法的比较概述。这项贡献还考察了在整个市场,政府和民间社会的劳动分工中对社会“责任”和媒体“问责制”等概念的学术反思和概念化。我们正在考虑建立问责机制,例如政府与广播公司之间的合同,监察员,自我调节的形式,监督机构,公众咨询的形式以及寻求与公民联系的职业(例如,公民新闻)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号