首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Communication >Britain and Germany Imagining the Future of Europe: National Identity, Mass Media and the Public Sphere
【24h】

Britain and Germany Imagining the Future of Europe: National Identity, Mass Media and the Public Sphere

机译:英国和德国想象欧洲的未来:民族认同,大众媒体和公共领域

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Received wisdom has it that the economic and political integration of Europe via the European Union in the post-Second World War period has not been matched by the creation of a shared democratic identity. This is often referred to as a communication deficit or a democratic deficit. A truly democratic Europe is not possible according to this argument because there is no European public sphere where citizens can meet, discuss and form opinions. Scholars wishing to find evidence of the existence of a fledgling European public sphere tend to have given up on the idea of trans-European media institutions and now look for signs of 'Europeanization' of national discourses (often labouring under the misapprehension that there are homogeneous national discourses). Novy sets the condition for the existence of a European public as (1) the simultaneous communication of the same European issues in different national media systems and (2) the discourse between national publics that include common reference points, relevant information from other states and the presence of non-national actors. This is public sphere 'light' as it does not require the Europeanised national publics to think of itself as a public. Some would argue that this light version is so light that such a situation even if it did exist could hardly be classed as a public sphere in a Habermasian sense.
机译:公认的智慧是,在第二次世界大战后的欧洲通过欧洲联盟进行经济和政治一体化并没有创造共同的民主身份。这通常被称为沟通缺陷或民主缺陷。根据这一论点,不可能有一个真正民主的欧洲,因为没有欧洲公共领域的公民可以聚会,讨论和形成意见。希望找到证据表明存在欧洲羽翼未丰的公共领域的学者倾向于放弃跨欧洲媒体机构的想法,而现在寻找民族话语“欧洲化”的迹象(通常是在误解中认为同质性国家话语)。 Novy为欧洲公众的存在设定了条件:(1)在不同国家的媒体系统中同时传播同一欧洲问题;(2)国家公众之间的讨论,包括共同的参考点,其他国家的相关信息以及非国家行为者的存在。这是公共领域的“亮点”,因为它不需要欧洲化的国家公众将自己视为公众。有人会认为这种轻量级版本太轻,以至于这种情况即使存在,也很难从哈贝马斯主义的意义上归为公共领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号