首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Cognitive Psychology >Does a tool eliminate spatial compatibility effects?
【24h】

Does a tool eliminate spatial compatibility effects?

机译:工具会消除空间兼容性影响吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Responding to a stimulus is faster and more accurate when stimulus location and response location spatially correspond than when they do not correspond (stimulus-response compatibility). In five experiments this standard compatibility effect is examined when using a T-shaped lever as a tool. Handling the lever allowed distinguishing body-related action effects (e.g., the tactile feedback from the moving finger) from external action effects (e.g., reaching at the stimulus with the lever's end-point). Results showed that the spatial relationship between stimulus and the direction of the hand movement (S-R compatibility) as well as the relationship between the stimulus and the functional end-points of the tool (S-E compatibility) determine performance. More precisely, responses were fast and less error prone when both kinds of compatibility did correspond than when they did not correspond.
机译:当刺激位置和响应位置在空间上相对应时,对刺激的响应要比不对应时更快和更准确(刺激-响应兼容性)。在五个实验中,当使用T形杠杆作为工具时,将检查此标准兼容性效果。操纵杠杆可以将与身体相关的动作效果(例如,来自活动手指的触觉反馈)与外部动作效果(例如,以杠杆的端点到达刺激位置)区分开。结果表明,刺激与手运动方向之间的空间关系(S-R兼容性)以及刺激与工具功能性端点之间的关系(S-E兼容性)决定了性能。更准确地说,当两种兼容性都对应时,响应速度快,错误率低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号