...
首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Graffiti Art: The Rights of Landlords, Tenants and Artists: Creative Foundation v Dreamland Leisure Ltd
【24h】

Graffiti Art: The Rights of Landlords, Tenants and Artists: Creative Foundation v Dreamland Leisure Ltd

机译:涂鸦艺术:房东,房客和艺术家的权利:Creative Foundation v Dreamland Leisure Ltd

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Creative Foundation v Dreamland Leisure Ltd1 results from a dispute between a landlord and tenant over rights to an unsolicited Banksy graffiti work on an external wall. The rights of the landlord prevailed over those of the tenant, as would be expected, but consideration of Banksy s rights was notable by its absence. This article summarises the position between landlord and tenant, and goes on to propose a number of ways Banksy might have attained rights in the work under intellectual property and personal property law.
机译:Creative Foundation v Dreamland Leisure Ltd1是由房东和租户之间关于外墙未经请求的Banksy涂鸦作品的权利的争议而产生的。可以预见,房东的权利优先于房客的权利,但是由于班克斯(Banksy)的权利缺席,因此值得考虑。本文总结了房东和房客之间的立场,并继续提出Banksy在知识产权和个人财产法下可能获得工作权利的多种方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号