首页> 外文期刊>European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology >The impact of the microphone position on the frequency analysis of snoring sounds
【24h】

The impact of the microphone position on the frequency analysis of snoring sounds

机译:麦克风位置对打声频率分析的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Frequency analysis of snoring sounds has been reported as a diagnostic tool to differentiate between different sources of snoring. Several studies have been published presenting diverging results of the frequency analyses of snoring sounds. Depending on the position of the used microphones, the results of the frequency analysis of snoring sounds vary. The present study investigated the influence of different microphone positions on the outcome of the frequency analysis of snoring sounds. Nocturnal snoring was recorded simultaneously at six positions (air-coupled: 30 cm middle, 100 cm middle, 30 cm lateral to both sides of the patients’ head; body contact: neck and parasternal) in five patients. The used microphones had a flat frequency response and a similar frequency range (10/40 Hz–18 kHz). Frequency analysis was performed by fast Fourier transformation and frequency bands as well as peak intensities (Peaks 1–5) were detected. Air-coupled microphones presented a wider frequency range (60 Hz–10 kHz) compared to contact microphones. The contact microphone at cervical position presented a cut off at frequencies above 300 Hz, whereas the contact microphone at parasternal position revealed a cut off above 100 Hz. On an exemplary base, the study demonstrates that frequencies above 1,000 Hz do appear in complex snoring patterns, and it is emphasised that high frequencies are imported for the interpretation of snoring sounds with respect to the identification of the source of snoring. Contact microphones might be used in screening devices, but for a natural analysis of snoring sounds the use of air-coupled microphones is indispensable.
机译:打reported声音的频率分析已被报告为区分打tool不同来源的诊断工具。已发表了几项研究,提出了打sound声频率分析的不同结果。根据所用麦克风的位置,打声的频率分析结果会有所不同。本研究调查了不同麦克风位置对打声频率分析结果的影响。五名患者同时在六个位置记录了夜间打呼air(空气耦合:患者头部两侧中间30厘米,中间100厘米,侧面30厘米;身体接触:颈部和胸骨旁)。使用的麦克风具有平坦的频率响应和相似的频率范围(10/40 Hz–18 kHz)。通过快速傅立叶变换进行频率分析,并检测到频带和峰强度(峰1-5)。与接触式麦克风相比,空气耦合麦克风呈现出更宽的频率范围(60 Hz–10 kHz)。宫颈位置的接触式麦克风在300 Hz以上的频率处出现截止,而胸骨旁位置的接触式麦克风在100 Hz以上时出现截止。在示例性基础上,研究表明,高于1000 Hz的频率的确以复杂的打patterns模式出现,并强调指出,为了识别打nor声源,需要引入高频来解释打s声。接触式麦克风可能用于筛选设备,但是对于打but声的自然分析,必不可少的是使用空气耦合麦克风。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号