...
首页> 外文期刊>European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology >Ossicular reconstruction: hydroxyapatite bone cement versus incus remodelling How to manage incudostapedial discontinuity
【24h】

Ossicular reconstruction: hydroxyapatite bone cement versus incus remodelling How to manage incudostapedial discontinuity

机译:骨听骨重建:羟基磷灰石骨水泥与砧骨重塑如何处理颅骨ped突间断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to compare the hearing outcome using hydroxyapatite (HA) bone cement to bridge the incudostapedial gap versus incus remodelling for ossiculoplasty in case of incudostapedial discontinuity. A non-randomized retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary referral otologic centre. The intervention in 24 primary cases of conductive hearing loss was subsequent middle ear inspection where incudostapedial discontinuity was observed. HA bone cement was used in 10 consecutive cases, and incus remodelling was performed in 14 consecutive cases. Air–bone gap (ABG), bone-conduction (BC) thresholds, and air-conduction (AC) thresholds were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. No patients were lost to follow-up. Pure-tone averages were calculated according to the guidelines of the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium for the evaluation of conductive hearing loss. The Amsterdam Hearing Evaluation Plots are presented. The postoperative ABG closure to within 20 and 10 dB at 12 months was, respectively, 80 and 40% in the HA bone cement group and 57.1 and 28.6% in the standard ossiculoplasty group (no statistically significant difference). However, we observed a statistically significant difference in ABG gain at 6 and 12 months favoring the HA bone cement cases. No short-term or intermediate-term adverse reactions were observed. Hydroxyapatite bone cement bridging ossiculoplasty offers a better intermediate-term ABG gain than standard ossiculoplasty. This new technique is a valuable alternative to conventional ossiculoplasty and presents the practical advantage of being easier and faster.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较使用羟基磷灰石(HA)骨水泥桥接假骨钉间隙和在假骨钉不连续的情况下进行骨成形术的砧骨重塑的听力结果。在三级转诊耳科中心进行了非随机回顾性研究。在随后的中耳检查中观察到了24例传导性听力损失的主要病例,其中发现了隐足钉间断。连续10例使用了HA骨水泥,连续14例进行了砧骨重塑。术前以及术后3、6和12个月评估气隙(ABG),骨导(BC)和气导(AC)阈值。没有患者失去随访。根据听力和平衡委员会的指导原则,计算纯音平均值,以评估传导性听力损失。介绍了阿姆斯特丹听力评估图。 HA骨水泥组的术后ABG闭合在20个月和10 dB以内分别为80%和40%,标准骨成形术组分别为57.1和28.6%(无统计学意义)。但是,我们观察到在有利于HA骨水泥病例的6个月和12个月时,ABG的增加存在统计学上的显着差异。没有观察到短期或中期不良反应。羟基磷灰石骨水泥桥接骨成形术比标准骨成形术具有更好的中期ABG增益。这项新技术是传统人工骨成形术的一种有价值的替代方法,并且具有更简便,更快速的实际优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号