...
首页> 外文期刊>EURO Journal on Decision Processes >Stochastic dominance, regret dominance and regret-theoretic dominance
【24h】

Stochastic dominance, regret dominance and regret-theoretic dominance

机译:随机优势,后悔优势和后悔理论优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is well known that stochastic dominance alone is insufficient for ensuring preferences when individuals experience regret. In this paper, we study two additional notions of dominance: (a) regret-theoretic dominance, which characterizes preferences in regret theory and (b) regret dominance, which characterizes preferences in mean-risk models with regret-based risk measures. We (a) extend our understanding of preferences in regret theory to problems with multiple choices under an infinite number of scenarios, (b) highlight that some notions of regret in the normative literature, specifically relative regret, can lead to unreasonable preferences within a mean-risk framework and (c) illustrate how regret dominance can help reduce the size of conventional efficient sets. Conditions where stochastic dominance, regret dominance and regret-theoretic dominance are equivalent are also presented.
机译:众所周知,当个体感到后悔时,仅凭随机优势不足以确保偏好。在本文中,我们研究了另外两个主导地位的概念:(a)遗憾理论主导地位,表征了后悔理论中的偏好;(b)遗憾主导地位,表征了具有基于后悔风险的均值风险模型中的偏好。我们(a)将对后悔理论中的偏好的理解扩展到在无数种情况下的多项选择问题,(b)强调规范文献中的某些后悔概念,特别是相对后悔,会在一定范围内导致不合理的偏好-风险框架和(c)说明了遗憾的支配地位如何有助于减小常规有效集的大小。还提出了随机优势,后悔优势和后悔理论优势相等的条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号