首页> 外文期刊>Ethnomusicology Forum >Reconsidering Music and Trance: Cross-cultural Differences and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives
【24h】

Reconsidering Music and Trance: Cross-cultural Differences and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives

机译:重新考虑音乐和Tra:跨文化差异和跨学科视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A small but significant body of recent research has successfully crossed the boundaries between ethnomusicology and psychology, and both disciplines are demonstrating a growing interest in charting interactions between music, context and individual consciousness. The phenomenon of trance is a clear example of the interaction of mind with specific cultural contexts, and cross-disciplinary approaches would appear highly relevant to future research. However, outside ethnomusicology and anthropology, despite the burgeoning field of music and consciousness studies, attitudes towards the constructs of trance and altered states of consciousness as reputable areas of scholarly enquiry are somewhat ambivalent. One reason for this is a continued lack of academic consensus over definitions of the terms ‘trance’ and ‘altered states’. This paper re-assesses the different ways in which trance has been conceptualised in the literature. It argues that the continued ethnomusicological focus on high arousal models of trance has led to the neglect (or exclusion) of other types of trancing, particularly specific instances of European-American secular trancing, and associated literature. I draw on my own UK-based study of solitary musical involvement in daily life, which has been informed by both psychological and ethnomusicological perspectives.View full textDownload full textKeywordsTrance, Music, Altered States, Phenomenology, Psychology, Ethnomusicology, Cross-cultural, HypnosisRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17411912.2011.592402
机译:最近的一小部分重要研究成功地突破了民族音乐学和心理学之间的界限,并且这两个学科都显示出人们对绘制音乐,情境和个人意识之间的相互作用的兴趣日益浓厚。 ance现象是头脑与特定文化背景相互作用的一个明显例子,跨学科方法似乎与未来的研究高度相关。然而,尽管音乐和意识研究领域蓬勃发展,但在外部人类音乐学和人类学领域,人们对于tr的建构和意识状态的改变作为学术研究的著名领域的态度还是有些矛盾的。造成这种情况的原因之一是,学术界对“ and”和“改变国家”的定义一直缺乏共识。本文重新评估了文献中tr概念化的不同方式。它认为,人类音乐学继续关注高唤醒of模型已经导致其他类型of的忽视(或排除),尤其是欧美世俗tr的特定实例以及相关文献。我借鉴了我自己在英国进行的关于日常生活中孤独音乐参与的研究,该研究已从心理学和民族音乐学的角度获得了启发。查看全文下载全文关键词Tr,音乐,改变的国家,现象学,心理学,民族音乐学,跨文化,催眠相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17411912.2011.592402

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号