首页> 外文期刊>Ergonomics >Ergonomics modelling and evaluation of automobile seat comfort.
【24h】

Ergonomics modelling and evaluation of automobile seat comfort.

机译:人机工程学建模和汽车座椅舒适性评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Automobile seats are developed in an iterative manner because subjective feedback, which is usually of questionable quality, drives the design. The time and cost associated with iteration could be justified if the process was guaranteed to produce a comfortable seat. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Current practices are based on the premise that seat system design teams need objective, measurable laboratory standards, which can be linked to subjective perceptions of comfort. Only in this way can predictions be made regarding whether or not a particular design will be viewed by the consumer as comfortable. This type of forecasting ability would effectively improve the efficiency with which automobile seats are designed. In this context, the research reported, developed, and validated a stepwise, multiple linear regression model relating seat interface pressure characteristics, occupant anthropometry, occupant demographics, and perceptions of seat appearance to an overall, subjective comfort index derived from a survey with proven levels of reliability and validity. The model performance statistics were: adjusted r(2) = 0.668, standard error of estimate = 2.308, F (6, 38) = 15.728, p = 0.000, and cross-validated r (15) = 0.952, p = 0.000. From the model, human criteria for seat interface pressure measures were established. These findings could not have been attained without first demonstrating that (1) the data collection protocol for seat interface pressure measurement was repeatable and (2) seat interface pressure measurements can be used to distinguish between seats.
机译:汽车座椅以迭代方式开发,因为通常具有可疑质量的主观反馈会驱动设计。如果保证过程能够产生舒适的座椅,那么与迭代相关的时间和成本是合理的。不幸的是,这种情况并非如此。当前的做法是基于这样的前提,即座椅系统设计团队需要客观,可测量的实验室标准,这些标准可以与对舒适性的主观感知联系在一起。只有这样,才能做出关于特定设计是否会被消费者视为舒适的预测。这种预测能力将有效提高汽车座椅的设计效率。在这种情况下,研究报告,开发并验证了逐步的多元线性回归模型,该模型将座椅界面压力特性,乘员人体测量学,乘员人口统计学和座椅外观感知与经过验证的水平得出的总体主观舒适度指数相关联可靠性和有效性。模型性能统计数据为:调整后的r(2)= 0.668,估计的标准误差= 2.308,F(6,38)= 15.728,p = 0.000,以及交叉验证的r(15)= 0.952,p = 0.000。根据该模型,建立了座椅接口压力测量的人工标准。在没有首先证明(1)座椅接口压力测量的数据收集协议是可重复的,以及(2)座椅接口压力测量可用于区分座椅之间,才能获得这些发现。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ergonomics》 |2004年第8期|P.841-863|共23页
  • 作者

    Taboun S;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 基础医学;
  • 关键词

    Automobiles; Models; Evaluation; 汽车;

    机译:Automobiles;Models;Evaluation;汽车;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号