首页> 外文期刊>Ergonomics >Snap-on-handles for a non-powered hacksaw: an ergonomics evaluation, redesign and testing.
【24h】

Snap-on-handles for a non-powered hacksaw: an ergonomics evaluation, redesign and testing.

机译:无动力钢锯的按扣处理:人体工程学评估,重新设计和测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Based on the ergonomics evaluation of existing non-powered hacksaws with original/horizontal and conventional/market handles, ergonomically designed hacksaw handles are proposed. To accommodate the entire male and female populations, the hand dimensions are categorized into three groups: small, medium and large. The proposed handles give special emphasis to hand size, length, cross-section dimension and curvature. The three-sized handles for both the preferred (rear) and non-preferred (front) hands are interchangeable to suit the individual hand size. Thus, the concept of 'snap-on-handles' with a fixed hacksaw (blade) can be promoted. The ergonomically designed hacksaw handles were tested/compared with original/horizontal and conventional/market hacksaw handles, in terms of performance or productivity (depth of cut), muscular effort or strain (EMG) and subjective scores (acceptance/comfort). The experimental results conclusively proved that the ergonomically designed hacksaw handles were significantly better than the other handles in terms of the stated criteria. The performance or productivity improvements of the ergonomically designed handles were about 25 and 148%, when compared with the conventional/market and original/horizontal handles, respectively. Furthermore, when the ergonomically designed handle was not matched with the proper or appropriate hand size, there was a significant reduction in performance or productivity, increase in muscular effort and decrease in subjective scores of acceptance/comfort.
机译:基于对现有具有原始/水平和传统/市场把手的无动力钢锯的人体工程学评估,提出了符合人体工程学设计的钢锯手柄。为了容纳全部男性和女性人口,手的尺寸分为三组:小,中和大。建议的手柄特别强调手的大小,长度,横截面尺寸和曲率。首选(后)和非首选(前)手的三种尺寸的手柄可以互换,以适合各个手的大小。因此,可以提倡带有固定的钢锯(刀片)的“手柄抓紧”的概念。在性能或生产率(切入深度),肌肉力量或拉力(EMG)和主观评分(接受/舒适)方面,对符合人体工程学设计的钢锯手柄进行了测试/与原始/水平和常规/市场上的钢锯手柄进行了比较。实验结果最终证明,按照规定的标准,人体工程学设计的钢锯手柄明显优于其他手柄。与传统/市场手柄和原始/水平手柄相比,人体工程学设计的手柄的性能或生产率分别提高了25%和148%。此外,当人机工程学设计的手柄与正确或适当的手部尺寸不匹配时,性能或生产率会显着降低,肌肉力量会增加,主观接受/舒适度会降低。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ergonomics》 |2005年第1期|P.78-97|共20页
  • 作者

    Das B; Jongkol P; Ngui S;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Industrial Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. biman.das@dal.ca;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 基础医学;
  • 关键词

    Hand; SIZES; Performance; Evaluation; Ergonomics; 手;

    机译:手;尺寸;性能;评估;人机工程学;手;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号