首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Values >Sustainability and the 'Struggle for Existence': The Critical Role of Metaphor in Society's Metabolism
【24h】

Sustainability and the 'Struggle for Existence': The Critical Role of Metaphor in Society's Metabolism

机译:可持续性与“生存斗争”:隐喻在社会新陈代谢中的关键作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents a historical examination of the influence of the Darwinian metaphor 'the struggle for existence' on a variety of scientific theories which inform our current understanding of the prospects for sustainable development. The first part of the paper traces the use of the metaphor of struggle through two distinct avenues of thought relevant to the search for sustainable development. One of these avenues leads to the biophysical critique of conventional development popularised by 'ecological economists' such as Georgescu-Roegen and Daly. This critique suggests that modern economic systems have gone astray by failing to respect the biological and physical limits to development and that they should be adapted to make them more like ecological systems. The other avenue leads to the modern insights of evolutionary psychology. These latter insights suggest that in certain key respects, the economic system (and actors within it) are already behaving more or less like an ecological system, driven as they are by evolutionary imperatives. Consequently, this second avenue appears to offer far bleaker prospects for achieving sustainable development than the first. However, the final part of the paper re-examines the historical roots of the metaphor itself, and suggests a number of ways in which a critical response to those historical roots might influence our understanding of the prospects for sustainable development.
机译:本文对达尔文的“生存斗争”隐喻对各种科学理论的影响进行了历史考察,这些理论为我们当前对可持续发展前景的理解提供了信息。本文的第一部分通过与寻求可持续发展有关的两种不同思路来追溯斗争隐喻的使用。这些途径之一导致了对传统发展的生物物理学批判,受到了诸如乔治·罗根(Georgescu-Roegen)和戴利(Daly)这样的“生态经济学家”的广泛欢迎。这种批评表明,现代经济系统由于不尊重发展的生物和物理限制而误入歧途,应该对其进行调整以使其更像生态系统。另一种途径是对进化心理学的现代见解。这些后来的见解表明,在某些关键方面,经济系统(及其内部的参与者)已经或多或少地表现为生态系统,并受到进化的驱动。因此,第二种途径似乎比第一种途径为实现可持续发展提供了更加黯淡的前景。但是,本文的最后部分重新审视了隐喻本身的历史根源,并提出了多种方式,对这些历史根源的批判性回应可能会影响我们对可持续发展前景的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号