...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Values >Exchange Relationships and the Environment: The Acceptability of Compensation in the Siting of Waste Disposal Facilities
【24h】

Exchange Relationships and the Environment: The Acceptability of Compensation in the Siting of Waste Disposal Facilities

机译:交换关系与环境:废物处置设施选址中补偿的可接受性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Within siting literature there is strong agreement that compensation for environmental risks is a necessary condition for local acceptance of waste treatment facilities. In-kind compensation is commonly pushed forward as being more effective than financial benefits in reducing local opposition. By focusing on the siting of a sanitary landfill in Santiago, Chile, this paper explores the performance of both types of compensation and relates the analysis to the notion of social norms of exchange. These are understood as being based on three main types of social relations: care, justice and freedom. Whereas monetary compensation is associated with market relations based on freedom and the offer of in-kind compensation to egalitarian relations based on justice, the absence of compensation is linked to fraternal relations based on care. It is argued that in-kind compensation is more acceptable than monetary payments or no compensation because people tend to understand siting conflicts more as matters of justice rather than as matters of freedom or care.
机译:在选址文献中,人们强烈同意赔偿环境风险是当地接受废物处理设施的必要条件。通常,实物补偿在减少当地反对方面比经济利益更为有效。通过关注智利圣地亚哥的卫生垃圾填埋场的选址,本文探讨了两种补偿的表现,并将分析与社会交换规范的概念联系起来。这些被理解为基于三种主要的社会关系类型:护理,正义和自由。货币补偿与基于自由的市场关系以及基于正义的平等关系提供实物补偿相关,而补偿的缺失与基于护理的兄弟关系相关。有人认为,实物补偿比货币付款或无补偿更容易接受,因为人们倾向于将选址冲突更多地理解为正义而不是自由或关怀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号