首页> 外文期刊>Environmental toxicology and chemistry >ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS: ENDPOINTS OR TRIGGERS FOR A TIERED ECOLOGICAL EFFECT ASSESSMENT APPROACH?
【24h】

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS: ENDPOINTS OR TRIGGERS FOR A TIERED ECOLOGICAL EFFECT ASSESSMENT APPROACH?

机译:环境质量标准:采用分层的生态效果评估方法的终点或触发点?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The recently derived Dutch Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) for water, soil, and sediment for approximately 170 substances have been evaluated. Three methods have been used to derive the Dutch EQS. Independent of how the EQS were derived, they are given equal weight in Dutch environmental policy. Scientifically, the three methods may deserve different weights. For example, for soil and sediment, the least reliable method had to be applied to derive most of the EQS. Ecological effects in these compartments may be either overestimated or underestimated. A multitiered approach is proposed, which is relevant for all parties involved, including other countries, and which may help improve ecological effect assessment.
机译:最近评估了荷兰关于水,土壤和沉积物的大约170种物质的环境质量标准(EQS)。已使用三种方法来得出荷兰EQS。与EQS的来源无关,它们在荷兰环境政策中的权重相同。从科学上讲,这三种方法应具有不同的权重。例如,对于土壤和沉积物,必须采用最不可靠的方法来导出大部分EQS。这些区域的生态影响可能被高估或被低估。提出了一种多层次的方法,该方法与所有相关方(包括其他国家)都相关,并且可能有助于改善生态效果评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号