...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Implications of Using On-Farm Flood Flow Capture To Recharge Groundwater and Mitigate Flood Risks Along the Kings River, CA
【24h】

Implications of Using On-Farm Flood Flow Capture To Recharge Groundwater and Mitigate Flood Risks Along the Kings River, CA

机译:利用农场洪水流量补给地下水并缓解加州金斯河沿岸的洪水风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The agriculturally productive San Joaquin Valley faces two severe hydrologic issues: persistent ground-water overdraft and flooding risks. Capturing flood flows for groundwater recharge could help address both of these issues, yet flood flow frequency, duration, and magnitude vary greatly as upstream reservoir releases are affected by snowpack, precipitation type, reservoir volume, and flood risks. This variability makes dedicated, engineered recharge approaches expensive. Our work evaluates leveraging private farmlands in the Kings River Basin to capture flood flows for direct and in lieu recharge, calculates on-farm infiltration rates, assesses logistics, and considers potential water quality issues. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil series suggested that a cementing layer would hinder recharge. The standard practice of deep ripping fractured the layer, resulting in infiltration rates averaging 2.5 in d~(-1) (6 cm d~(-1)) throughout the farm. Based on these rates 10 acres are needed to infiltrate 1 cfs (100 m~3 h~(-1)) of flood flows. Our conceptual model predicts that salinity and nitrate pulses flush initially to the groundwater but that groundwater quality improves in the long term due to pristine flood flows low in salts or nitrate. Flood flow capture, when integrated with irrigation, is more cost-effective than groundwater pumping.
机译:具有农业生产能力的圣华金河谷面临两个严重的水文问题:持续的地下水透支和洪水风险。捕获洪水流量以补给地下水可以帮助解决这两个问题,但是由于上游水库的放水受到积雪,降水类型,水库容量和洪水风险的影响,洪水的频率,持续时间和水量变化很大。这种可变性使专门设计的充电方法变得昂贵。我们的工作评估利用国王河流域的私人农田来捕获洪水,以直接和代替补给,计算农田的渗透率,评估物流,并考虑潜在的水质问题。自然资源保护局(NRCS)的土壤系列表明胶结层会阻碍补给。深层撕裂的标准做法使该层破裂,导致整个农场的平均渗透速率为d〜(-1)(6 cm d〜(-1))2.5。基于这些速率,需要渗透10英亩(1 cfs(100 m〜3 h〜(-1))的洪水流量)。我们的概念模型预测,盐度和硝酸盐脉冲最初会冲刷到地下水中,但是由于盐和硝酸盐含量较低的原始洪水流,从长远来看,地下水质量会改善。当与灌溉结合使用时,洪流捕获比地下水抽取更具成本效益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2014年第23期|13601-13609|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Bachand & Associates, 509D Fourth Street, Davis, California 94549, United States,Tetra Tech Inc., 3746 Mount Diablo Boulevard, Suite 300, Lafayette, California 94549, United States;

    Tetra Tech Inc., 3746 Mount Diablo Boulevard, Suite 300, Lafayette, California 94549, United States;

    Sustainable Conservation, 98 Battery Street, Suite 302, San Francisco, California 94111, United States;

    Terranova Ranch, W. Floral Avenue, Helm, California 93627, United States;

    University of California Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号