首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >The Rise of Stem Cell Toxicology
【24h】

The Rise of Stem Cell Toxicology

机译:干细胞毒理学的兴起

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The field of environmental toxicology has been challenged in the last few decades by the exponential discovery of novel persistent pollutants and the relative lack of knowledge of their hazardousness to human health. At the same time, there has been increasing awareness of the urgency and necessity of innovative, validated, and comprehensive assays to collect toxicity data more relevant to humans. Since the onset of toxicology science, we have heavily relied on animal tests. Although these in vivo experiments have been refined in recent years, they are still expensive, labor intensive, time-consuming, and accompanied by ethical issues. More importantly, Russell and Burch's "high fidelity fallacy" theory postulates that toxicity assays with animals are not always applicable to human health due to interspecies variations, even when primates are used. A prototypical example is the case of the drug thalidomide, proven to be highly teratogenic in humans even though it had passed all animal tests. This led to the introduction of in vitro tests as alternatives to in vivo animal experiments (reviewed in ref 2). In particular, the culture of human cells for toxicity tests, more directly relevant to human health, has been the primary solution to the obvious fact that humans cannot be used for in vivo studies. However, the direct derivation of some types of primary human cells, can be extremely invasive or simply impossible, and even if successful, the ability of primary cells to be cultured and expanded in vitro is limited. Conversely, immortalized or cancer cell lines can be readily grown and amplified in dishes; nevertheless, they may no longer be representative of the cells of origin because of accumulating mutations or altered cell functions, for example. Collectively, these issues can greatly affect the generation and interpretation of toxicity data. However, as described below, new stem cell technologies for the in vitro analyses of pollutants' potential hazardousness, allow scientists to move past these problems.
机译:在过去的几十年中,环境毒理学领域一直受到挑战,这是由于新型持久性污染物的指数发现以及相对缺乏对人类健康危害的知识而引起的。同时,人们越来越意识到创新,经过验证和全面的分析方法来收集与人类更相关的毒性数据的紧迫性和必要性。自毒理学开始以来,我们就严重依赖动物试验。尽管近年来已经对这些体内实验进行了改进,但它们仍然昂贵,劳动密集,耗时且伴随着道德问题。更重要的是,罗素和伯奇(Russell and Burch)的“高保真谬误”理论假定,即使使用灵长类动物,由于种间差异,对动物进行的毒性试验也不总是适用于人类健康。一个典型的例子是沙利度胺,尽管它已经通过了所有动物试验,但已证明在人类中具有很高的致畸性。这导致引入了体外测试,作为体内动物实验的替代方法(参见参考文献2)。特别地,用于毒性测试的人类细胞培养物与人类健康更直接相关,已经成为解决人类不能用于体内研究这一明显事实的主要解决方案。但是,某些类型的原代人类细胞的直接衍生可能是极具侵略性的,或者根本是不可能的,即使成功,原代细胞在体外培养和扩增的能力也受到限制。相反,永生化或癌细胞系可以很容易地在培养皿中生长和扩增。然而,例如由于积累的突变或改变的细胞功能,它们可能不再代表起源细胞。总的来说,这些问题会极大地影响毒性数据的产生和解释。但是,如下所述,用于体外分析污染物潜在危害的新干细胞技术使科学家们能够克服这些问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2015年第10期|5847-5848|共2页
  • 作者单位

    State Key Laboratory of Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;

    State Key Laboratory of Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;

    State Key Laboratory of Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;

    State Key Laboratory of Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号