首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Disinfection Technologies Used in Small Drinking Water Systems
【24h】

Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Disinfection Technologies Used in Small Drinking Water Systems

机译:小型饮用水系统中使用的消毒技术对生命周期的环境影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Small drinking water systems serve a fifth of the U.S. population and rely heavily on disinfection. While chlorine disinfection is common, there is interest in minimizing chemical addition, especially due to carcinogenic disinfection byproducts and chlorine-resistant pathogens, by using ultraviolet technologies; however, the relative, broader environmental impacts of these technologies are not well established, especially in the context of small (<10 000 people) water systems. The objective of this study was to identify environmental trade-offs between chlorine and ultraviolet disinfection via comparative life cycle assessment. The functional unit was the production of 1 m~(3) of drinking water to U.S. standards. Treatment included cartridge filtration followed by either chlorine disinfection or ultraviolet disinfection with chlorine residual addition. Environmental performance was evaluated for various chlorine contact zone materials (plastic, concrete, steel), ultraviolet validation factors (1.2 to 4.4), and electricity sources (renewable; U.S. average, high, and low impact grids). Performance was also evaluated when filtration and chlorine residual were not required. From a life cycle assessment perspective, replacing chlorine with UV was preferred only in a limited number of cases (i.e., high pumping pressure but filtration is not required). In all others, chlorine was environmentally preferred, although some contact zone materials and energy sources had an impact on the comparison. Utilities can use these data to inform their disinfection technology selection and operation to minimize environmental and human health impacts.
机译:小型饮用水系统服务于美国五分之一的人口,并且严重依赖消毒。尽管氯消毒很普遍,但是人们有兴趣通过使用紫外线技术来减少化学药品的添加,特别是由于致癌的消毒副产物和耐氯病原体引起的化学添加;然而,这些技术的相对,更广泛的环境影响尚未得到充分证实,尤其是在小型(<10,000人)的供水系统中。这项研究的目的是通过比较生命周期评估来确定氯和紫外线消毒之间的环境取舍。功能单元是按照美国标准生产1 m〜(3)的饮用水。处理包括滤筒过滤,然后进行氯气消毒或添加氯气残留物的紫外线消毒。评估了各种氯接触区材料(塑料,混凝土,钢),紫外线验证系数(1.2至4.4)和电源(可再生;美国平均,高和低冲击力网格)的环境性能。当不需要过滤和残留氯气时,还评估了性能。从生命周期评估的角度来看,仅在少数情况下(例如,高泵送压力但不需要过滤),才优选用UV代替氯。在所有其他情况下,尽管某些接触区的材料和能源对比较产生了影响,但氯在环境方面是优选的。公用事业公司可以使用这些数据来告知其消毒技术的选择和操作,以最大程度地减少对环境和人类健康的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2018年第5期|2998-3007|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States;

    Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States;

    Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States;

    Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号