首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Comparison of Toxicity-Weighted Disinfection Byproduct Concentrations in Potable Reuse Waters and Conventional Drinking Waters as a New Approach to Assessing the Quality of Advanced Treatment Train Waters
【24h】

Comparison of Toxicity-Weighted Disinfection Byproduct Concentrations in Potable Reuse Waters and Conventional Drinking Waters as a New Approach to Assessing the Quality of Advanced Treatment Train Waters

机译:饮用水回用水和常规饮用水中毒性加权消毒副产物浓度的比较,作为评估深度处理火车水质的新方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Advanced treatment trains based on oxidation, biofiltration, and/or granular activated carbon (Ox/BAF/GAC) are an attractive alternative to those based on microfiltration, reverse osmosis, and advanced oxidation (MF/RO/AOP) for the potable reuse of municipal wastewater effluents, but their effluent quality is difficult to validate with respect to chemical contaminants. This study evaluated the sum of the concentrations of 46 disinfection byproducts (DBPs) after treatment by chlorine or chloramines weighted by metrics of toxic potency in 10 full- or pilot-scale reuse trains to estimate the DBP-associated toxicity of their effluents. These total toxicity weighted DBP concentrations were compared to those measured in their local, conventional drinking waters as a benchmark for water quality receiving regulatory and widespread public acceptance. The results indicated that while the DBP-associated quality of MF/RO/AOP-based reuse waters can readily exceed that of drinking waters, that of Ox/BAF/GAC-based reuse waters can approach or exceed that of drinking waters, particularly when they are chloraminated. Unregulated, halogenated DBPs were the dominant contributors to the estimated DBP-associated toxicity. While RO/AOP treatment preferentially reduced the concentrations of the more toxic brominated DBP species, BAC and GAC treatment favored brominated DBP species by removing DOC but not bromide. Comparing the total toxicity-weighted DBP concentration between reuse and drinking waters provides drinking water as a rational benchmark for water quality comparison, explicitly recognizes that contaminants occur as mixtures, provides utilities flexibility in selecting the most efficient treatment trains to reduce estimated toxicity, and can be expanded to encompass new contaminants as toxic potency data become available.
机译:基于氧化,生物过滤和/或颗粒状活性炭(Ox / BAF / GAC)的先进处理工艺是基于微过滤,反渗透和先进氧化(MF / RO / AOP)的可替代方法的有吸引力的替代品市政废水,但就化学污染物而言,其废水质量难以验证。这项研究评估了氯或氯胺处理后的46种消毒副产物(DBP)浓度的总和,并在10个满规模或中试规模的重复使用火车中对它们的毒性进行了加权,以估算其废水与DBP相关的毒性。将这些总毒性加权DBP浓度与其在当地常规饮用水中测得的浓度进行比较,以此作为受到监管和广泛公众接受的水质基准。结果表明,虽然基于MF / RO / AOP的回用水的DBP相关质量可以轻易超过饮用水,但是基于Ox / BAF / GAC的回水的DBP质量可以接近或超过饮用水,特别是当他们被氯化了。不受管制的卤代DBP是估计的DBP相关毒性的主要贡献者。尽管RO / AOP处理优先降低了毒性更高的溴化DBP物质的浓度,但BAC和GAC处理通过去除DOC而不是溴化物而偏爱溴化DBP物质。比较回用水和饮用水之间的总毒性加权DBP浓度,可以将饮用水作为水质比较的合理基准,明确认识到污染物以混合物的形式出现,为公用事业提供了选择最有效的处理方法以降低估计毒性的灵活性,并且可以随着毒性数据的获得,可以扩展到包括新的污染物。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2019年第7期|3729-3738|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305 USA;

    Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305 USA;

    Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号