首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Pollution >Measuring ammonia emissions from land applied manure: an intercomparison of commonly used samplers and techniques
【24h】

Measuring ammonia emissions from land applied manure: an intercomparison of commonly used samplers and techniques

机译:测量土地施用肥料中的氨气排放量:常用采样器和技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A number of techniques have been developed to quantify ammonia (NH3) emissions following land application of manure or fertiliser. In this study, coefficients of variation were determined for three commonly used field techniques (mass balance integrated horizontal flux, wind tunnels and the equilibrium concentration technique) for measuring emissions from a range of manure types. Coefficients of variation (CV) for absorption flasks, passive flux samplers and passive diffusion samplers were 21, 10 and 14%, respectively. In comparative measurements, concentrations measured using passive flux samplers and absorption flasks did not differ significantly, but those measured using passive diffusion samplers were on average 1.8 times greater. The mass balance technique and wind tunnels gave broadly similar results in two out of four field tests. Overexposure of passive diffusion samplers for some sampling periods meant that estimation of cumulative NH3 emission using the equilibrium concentration technique in the field tests could not be made. For cumulative NH3 emissions, CVs were in the range of 23-52, 46-74 and 21-39% for the mass balance, wind tunnel and equilibrium concentration techniques, respectively. Lower CVs were associated with measurements following slurry compared with solid manure applications. Our conclusions from this study are that for the measurement of absolute emissions the mass balance technique is to be preferred, and for small-plot comparative measurements the wind tunnel system is preferred to the equilibrium concentration technique. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:已经开发出许多技术来量化在土地上施用肥料或肥料后的氨(NH3)排放。在这项研究中,确定了三种常用的田间技术(质量平衡积分水平通量,风洞和平衡浓度技术)的变异系数,以测量多种肥料的排放量。吸收瓶,无源通量采样器和无源扩散采样器的变异系数(CV)分别为21%,10%和14%。在对比测量中,使用无源通量采样器和吸收瓶测量的浓度没有显着差异,但使用无源扩散采样器测量的浓度平均高1.8倍。在四分之三的现场测试中,质量平衡技术和风洞得出的结果大致相似。无源扩散采样器在某些采样周期内过度暴露意味着无法在现场测试中使用平衡浓度技术估算累积NH3排放量。对于累积的NH3排放,质量平衡,风洞和平衡浓度技术的CV分别在23-52%,46-74和21-39%的范围内。与固体肥料相比,较低的CV与泥浆后的测量相关。我们从这项研究中得出的结论是,对于绝对排放的测量,质量平衡技术是首选,对于小面积比较测量,风洞系统比平衡浓度技术更可取。 (c)2004 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号