首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Politics >Environmentalism between state and local community: why Greenpeace has failed in Norway
【24h】

Environmentalism between state and local community: why Greenpeace has failed in Norway

机译:国家与地方社区之间的环保主义:绿色和平为何在挪威失败

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although Norway is often seen as an environmental forerunner with an extensive voluntary sector, the internationally successful environmental organisation Greenpeace has never managed to establish a viable organisation there. The explanation for this lies in a Norwegian political culture that includes two distinct culturally embedded anomalies that configure a specific type of environmentalism. The first anomaly is Norway's state-friendly society in which the political and social system invites adversaries or interest groups to participate in national politics. Greenpeace, with its strict policy of organisational independence, has not fitted in with the state-friendly society. The second anomaly is the local community perspective. Popular environmental concerns take into account and cherish the social hardship and self-sufficiency that for centuries characterised life in the country's peripheries. The protection of man in nature, and its mythologisation, has eliminated animal rights from national environmental ideology. Because Greenpeace's ideology runs counter to this local community perspective, it fails to tap into environmentalist sentiments. The two anomalies interact to inhibit the establishment of Greenpeace in Norway.
机译:尽管挪威经常被视为拥有广泛志愿部门的环境先驱,但国际上成功的环境组织绿色和平组织从未设法在此建立可行的组织。对此的解释是基于挪威的政治文化,其中包括两个截然不同的文化底蕴,这些异常构成了特定类型的环保主义。第一个异常是挪威的国家友好型社会,其中的政治和社会制度邀请敌对者或利益集团参加国家政治。绿色和平组织实行严格的组织独立性政策,但不适合国家友好型社会。第二个异常是当地社区的观点。人们普遍关心的环境问题已得到考虑,并珍惜数个世纪以来该国周边地区生活的社会困境和自给自足。对自然界中人类的保护及其神秘化已从国家环境意识形态中消除了动物权利。由于绿色和平组织的意识形态与当地社区的观点背道而驰,因此它无法利用环保主义者的情绪。这两个异常相互作用抑制了挪威绿色和平组织的建立。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号