首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Modeling & Assessment >Uncertainty from Model Calibration: Applying a New Method to Transport Energy Demand Modelling
【24h】

Uncertainty from Model Calibration: Applying a New Method to Transport Energy Demand Modelling

机译:模型校准的不确定性:将新方法应用于运输能源需求建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Uncertainties in energy demand modelling originate from both limited understanding of the real-world system and a lack of data for model development, calibration and validation. These uncertainties allow for the development of different models, but also leave room for different calibrations of a single model. Here, an automated model calibration procedure was developed and tested for transport sector energy use modelling in the TIMER 2.0 global energy model. This model describes energy use on the basis of activity levels, structural change and autonomous and price-induced energy efficiency improvements. We found that the model could reasonably reproduce historic data underrndifferent sets of parameter values, leading to different projections of future energy demand levels. Projected energy use for 2030 shows a range of 44-95% around the best-fit projection. Two different model interpretations of the past can generally be distinguished: (1) high useful energy intensity and major energy efficiency improvements or (2) low useful energy intensity and little efficiency improvement. Generally, the first lead to higher future energy demand levels than the second, but model and insights do not provide decisive arguments to attribute a higher likelihood to one of the alternatives.
机译:能源需求建模的不确定性源于对现实世界系统的了解有限以及缺乏用于模型开发,校准和验证的数据。这些不确定性允许开发不同的模型,但也为单个模型的不同校准留有空间。在此,针对TIMER 2.0全球能源模型中的运输部门能源使用模型,开发并测试了自动模型校准程序。该模型基于活动水平,结构变化以及自主和价格诱导的能效改进来描述能源使用。我们发现该模型可以合理地重现不同参数值集下的历史数据,从而导致对未来能源需求水平的不同预测。到2030年的预计能源使用量将显示最佳拟合预测范围的44-95%。通常可以区分过去的两种不同的模型解释:(1)高有用能强度和主要的能源效率改善,或(2)低有用能强度和很少的效率改善。通常,第一种方法导致未来的能源需求水平高于第二种方法,但是模型和见解并未提供决定性的论据,以将较高的可能性归因于其中一种替代方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Modeling & Assessment》 |2010年第3期|p.175-188|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency (PBL), P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands;

    Department of Science, Technology and Society, Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands;

    Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency (PBL), P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands;

    Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency (PBL), P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands;

    Delft Center for Systems and Control, Delft University, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands;

    Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency (PBL), P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands Department of Science, Technology and Society, Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    model calibration; uncertainty; global energy model; transport energy use;

    机译:模型校准;不确定;全球能源模型;运输能源使用;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号