首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Modeling & Assessment >Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options
【24h】

Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options

机译:核对煤加CCS:两种竞争性基本负荷气候控制方案的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we analyze the relative importance and mutual behavior of two competing base-load electricity generation options that each are capable of contributing significantly to the abatement of global CO_2 emissions: nuclear energy and coal-based power production complemented with CO_2 capture and storage (CCS). We also investigate how, in scenarios developed with an integrated assessment model that simulates the economics of a climate-constrained world, the prospects for nuclear energy would change if exogenous limitations on the spread of nuclear technology were relaxed. Using the climate change economics model World Induced Technical Change Hybrid, we find that until 2050 the growth rates of nuclear electricity generation capacity would become comparable to historical rates observed during the 1980s. Given that nuclear energy continues to face serious challenges and contention, we inspect how extensive the improvements of coal-based power equipped with CCS technology would need to be if our economic optimization model is to significantly scale down the construction of new nuclear power plants.
机译:在本文中,我们分析了两种相互竞争的基本负荷发电方案的相对重要性和相互行为,这两种方案均能够为减少全球CO_2排放做出重大贡献:核能和煤基发电以及CO_2捕集与封存的补充(CCS)。我们还研究了在使用模拟气候受限世界的综合评估模型开发的方案中,如果放宽对核技术传播的外在限制,核能的前景将会改变。使用气候变化经济学模型“世界诱导技术变化混合动力”,我们发现,到2050年,核发电能力的增长率将变得可与1980年代观察到的历史速度相提并论。鉴于核能继续面临严峻的挑战和争论,我们考察了如果我们的经济优化模型要大幅缩减新核电站的建设规模,那么采用CCS技术的煤基电力需要进行多大的改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号