首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Modeling & Assessment >Economic Analysis of Summer Fallow Management to Reduce Take-All Disease and N Leaching in a Wheat Crop Rotation
【24h】

Economic Analysis of Summer Fallow Management to Reduce Take-All Disease and N Leaching in a Wheat Crop Rotation

机译:夏季休耕管理减少小麦轮作中所有病害和氮淋失的经济学分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper addresses the question of summer cover-crop adoption by farmers in presence of a risk of yield loss due to take-all disease and climate variability. To analyze the public incentives needed to encourage farmers to adopt summer cover crops as a means of reducing N leaching, we combine outputs from an economic, an epidemiological and an agronomic model. The economic model is a simple model of choice under risk. The farmer is assumed to choose among a range of summer fallow managements and input uses on the basis of the expected utility criterion (HARA assumption) in presence of both climate and take-all risks. The epidemiological model proposed by Ennaifar et al. (Eur J Plant Pathol 118:127-143, 2007) is used to determine the impact of take all on yields and N uptake. The crop-soil model (STICS) is used to compute yield developments and N leaching under various management options and climatic conditions. The input parameters are chosen to match the conditions prevailing in Grignon, located in the main wheat-growing area in France. Eight management systems are examined: four summer fallow managements: 'wheat volunteers' (WV), 'bare soil' (BS), 'early mustard', 'late mustard', and two input intensities. We show that the optimal systems are BS (WV) when the take-all risk is (not) taken into account by agents. We then compute the minimum payment to each system such that it emerges in the optimum. We thus derive the required amounts of transfer needed to trigger catch-crop adoption. The results of the Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis show that the ranking of management systems is robust over a wide range of input parameters.
机译:本文讨论了由于全病和气候多变性而导致产量损失的风险时,农民采用夏季覆盖作物的问题。为了分析鼓励农民采用夏季覆盖作物作为减少氮淋失的手段所需的公共激励措施,我们结合了经济,流行病学和农学模型的产出。经济模型是处于风险之下的简单选择模型。假定农民在有气候风险和全部风险的情况下,根据预期效用标准(HAR​​A假设)在一系列夏季休耕管理和投入用途之间进行选择。 Ennaifar等人提出的流行病学模型。 (Eur J Plant Pathol 118:127-143,2007)用于确定“通吃”对产量和氮吸收的影响。作物土壤模型(STICS)用于计算各种管理选项和气候条件下的单产发展和氮素淋失。选择输入参数以匹配位于法国主要小麦产区的格里尼翁的主要条件。检查了八个管理系统:四个夏季休耕管理:“小麦志愿者”(WV),“裸土”(BS),“早芥菜”,“晚芥菜”和两种投入强度。我们显示,当代理商不考虑整体风险时,最佳系统是BS(WV)。然后,我们计算每个系统的最低付款额,使其以最优的价格出现。因此,我们得出触发捕捞作物采用所需的所需转移量。蒙特卡洛敏感性分析的结果表明,管理系统的排名在各种输入参数范围内都很稳健。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号