首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >A Review of Environmental Life Cycle Assessments of Liquid Transportation Biofuels in the Pan American Region
【24h】

A Review of Environmental Life Cycle Assessments of Liquid Transportation Biofuels in the Pan American Region

机译:泛美地区液体运输生物燃料的环境生命周期评估研究述评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Life-cycle assessment (LCA) has been applied to many biofuel and bioenergy systems to determine potential environmental impacts, but the conclusions have varied. Different methodologies and processes for conducting LCA of biofuels make the results difficult to compare, in-tum making it difficult to make the best possible and informed decision. Of particular importance are the wide variability in country-specific conditions, modeling assumptions, data quality, chosen impact categories and indicators, scale of production, system boundaries, and co-product allocation. This study has a double purpose: conducting a critical evaluation comparing environmental LCA of biofuels from several conversion pathways and in several countries in the Pan American region using both qualitative and quantitative analyses, and making recommendations for harmonization with respect to biofuel LCA study features, such as study assumptions, inventory data, impact indicators, and reporting practices. The environmental management implications are discussed within the context of different national and international regulatory environments using a case study. The results from this study highlight LCA methodology choices that cause high variability in results and limit comparability among different studies, even among the same biofuel pathway, and recommendations are provided for improvement.
机译:生命周期评估(LCA)已应用于许多生物燃料和生物能源系统,以确定潜在的环境影响,但结论却有所不同。进行生物燃料生命周期评估的不同方法和过程使结果难以比较,导致难以做出最佳可能的明智决定。特别重要的是特定国家条件,模型假设,数据质量,所选影响类别和指标,生产规模,系统边界和副产品分配的广泛差异。这项研究具有双重目的:进行定性评估,使用定性和定量分析比较几种转化途径和泛美地区几个国家的生物燃料的环境LCA,并就生物燃料LCA研究的特征提出协调建议,例如作为研究假设,清单数据,影响指标和报告做法。通过案例研究,在不同的国家和国际法规环境下讨论了环境管理的含义。这项研究的结果强调了LCA方法学的选择,这些选择会导致结果差异很大,并限制了不同研究之间,甚至同一生物燃料途径之间的可比性,并提供了改进建议。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2015年第6期|1356-1376|共21页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA,Sustainable Futures Institute, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA;

    Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA;

    Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan, Merida, Mexico;

    Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan, Merida, Mexico;

    National Agricultural Technology Institute, INTA, Buenos Aires, Argentina;

    Sustainable Futures Institute, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA;

    CADIS - Center for LCA and Sustainable Design, Mexico City, Mexico;

    University of California, Irvine, CA, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Life-cycle assessment; Biofuels; Bioenergy; Sustainability; Pan American region;

    机译:生命周期评估;生物燃料;生物能源可持续发展;泛美地区;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号