首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Assessing Societal Impacts When Planning Restoration of Large Alluvial Rivers: A Case Study of the Sacramento River Project, California
【24h】

Assessing Societal Impacts When Planning Restoration of Large Alluvial Rivers: A Case Study of the Sacramento River Project, California

机译:在规划大型冲积河流恢复时评估社会影响:以加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托河项目为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Studies have shown that ecological restoration projects are more likely to gain public support if they simultaneously increase important human services that natural resources provide to people. River restoration projects have the potential to influence many of the societal functions (e.g., flood control, water quality) that rivers provide, yet most projects fail to consider this in a comprehensive manner. Most river restoration projects also fail to take into account opportunities for revitalization of large-scale river processes, focusing instead on opportunities presented at individual parcels. In an effort to avoid these pitfalls while planning restoration of the Sacramento River, we conducted a set of coordinated studies to evaluate societal impacts of alternative restoration actions over a large geographic area. Our studies were designed to identify restoration actions that offer benefits to both society and the ecosystem and to meet the information needs of agency planning teams focusing on the area. We worked with local partners and public stakeholders to design and implement studies that assessed the effects of alternative restoration actions on flooding and erosion patterns, socioeconomics, cultural resources, and public access and recreation. We found that by explicitly and scientifically melding societal and ecosystem perspectives, it was possible to identify restoration actions that simultaneously improve both ecosystem health and the services (e.g., flood protection and recreation) that the Sacramento River and its floodplain provide to people. Further, we found that by directly engaging with local stakeholders to formulate, implement, and interpret the studies, we were able to develop a high level of trust that ultimately translated into widespread support for the project.
机译:研究表明,生态修复项目如果同时增加自然资源为人们提供的重要人类服务,则更有可能获得公众支持。河流修复项目有可能影响河流提供的许多社会功能(例如防洪,水质),但是大多数项目未能全面考虑这一点。大多数河流修复项目也没有考虑到振兴大型河流过程的机会,而是将重点放在单个地块上的机会上。为了在规划萨克拉曼多河的修复工作时避免这些陷阱,我们进行了一系列协调研究,以评估替代性修复行动在较大地理区域上的社会影响。我们的研究旨在确定对社会和生态系统均有益的恢复行动,并满足专注于该地区的机构规划团队的信息需求。我们与当地合作伙伴和公共利益相关者合作,设计并实施了评估替代性恢复行动对洪水和侵蚀模式,社会经济学,文化资源以及公众访问和娱乐的影响的研究。我们发现,通过明确和科学地融合社会和生态系统的观点,可以确定恢复行动,同时改善萨克拉曼多河及其漫滩向人们提供的生态系统健康和服务(例如防洪和娱乐)。此外,我们发现,通过直接与当地利益相关者合作来制定,实施和解释研究,我们能够建立起高度的信任,最终转化为对该项目的广泛支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号