首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Synergistic Techniques For Better Understanding And Classifying The Environmental Structure Of Landscapes
【24h】

Synergistic Techniques For Better Understanding And Classifying The Environmental Structure Of Landscapes

机译:用于更好地理解和分类景观环境结构的协同技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The desire to capture natural regions in the landscape has been a goal of geographic and environmental classification and ecological land classification (ELC) for decades. Since the increased adoption of data-centric, multivariate, computational methods, the search for natural regions has become the search for the best classification that optimally trades off classification complexity for class homogeneity. In this study, three techniques are investigated for their ability to find the best classification of the physical environments of the Mt. Lofty Ranges in South Australia: AutoClass-C (a Bayesian classifier), a Kohonen Self-Organising Map neural network, and a k-means classifier with homogeneity analysis. AutoClass-C is specifically designed to find the classification that optimally trades off classification complexity for class homogeneity. However, AutoClass analysis was not found to be assumption-free because it was very sensitive to the user-specified level of relative error of input data. The AutoClass results suggest that there may be no way of finding the best classification without making critical assumptions as to the level of class heterogeneity acceptable in the classification when using continuous environmental data. Therefore, rather than relying on adjusting abstract parameters to arrive at a classification of suitable complexity, it is better to quantify and visualize the data structure and the relationship between classification complexity and class homogeneity. Individually and when integrated, the Self-Organizing Map and k-means classification with homogeneity analysis techniques also used in this study facilitate this and provide information upon which the decision of the scale of classification can be made. It is argued that instead of searching for the elusive classification of natural regions in the landscape, it is much better to understand and visualize the environmental structure of the landscape and to use this knowledge to select the best ELC at the required scale of analysis.
机译:捕获景观中自然区域的愿望一直是地理和环境分类以及生态土地分类(ELC)的目标。由于越来越多地采用以数据为中心的多元计算方法,对自然区域的搜索已成为对最佳分类的搜索,该最佳分类以最佳的方式权衡了分类复杂性以实现类的同质性。在这项研究中,研究了三种技术以寻找山的物理环境的最佳分类的能力。南澳大利亚州的崇高范围:AutoClass-C(贝叶斯分类器),Kohonen自组织映射神经网络和具有均质性分析的k均值分类器。 AutoClass-C专门设计用于查找分类,以最佳地权衡分类复杂度以获得类同质性。但是,没有发现AutoClass分析是无假设的,因为它对用户指定的输入数据相对误差水平非常敏感。 AutoClass的结果表明,使用连续的环境数据时,如果不对分类中可接受的类别异质性水平做出严格的假设,就不可能找到最佳分类。因此,与其依靠调整抽象参数来得出适当复杂度的分类,不如量化和可视化数据结构以及分类复杂度和类同质性之间的关系。本研究中还使用了具有均质分析技术的自组织图和k-均值分类进行个体化和集成化,从而促进了这一点,并提供了可用于确定分类规模的信息。有人认为,与其寻找景观中自然区域的难以捉摸的分类,不如更好地理解和可视化景观的环境结构,并利用这一知识在所需的分析规模下选择最佳的ELC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号