SYMBOLIC LEGITIMACY AND CHINESE ENVIRONMENTAL REFORM

摘要

At the heart of debates over Chinese rule of law is the question of state legitimacy. Critics argue that legitimacy requires liberal democratic rule of law. Chinese leaders have long relied on performance legitimacy-economic development and maintenance of social stability-as the core basis of their rule. Western scholarship on modem Chinese law and politics has, to a significant degree, critiqued the ability of China's current institutions to perform as claimed. But apart from any actual results that Chinese governance may generate, the entire project of governance reform can be structured in a way that influences public impressions of state legitimacy. The process of reform is not only about attaining performance goals, but is itself a kind of performance. This act of 'performing performance " also signals competence, commitment to the people, tradition, nationalist strength, and a host of other positive values to citizens and other audiences. This focus on the reform process itself as a means of "symbolic legitimation " is an aspect of China's "authoritarian resilience" that existing scholarship has virtually ignored. This Article develops the concept of symbolic legitimation and identifies its key tools, structures, and approaches. Central to the phenomenon is uncertainty created by complexity, active information control, and populist politics. When outputs are difficult to ascertain, reform inputs come to stand for outcomes. Even more, the reform process itself becomes an output that can signal state legitimacy, apart from any results the process might produce. The Article presents case studies on eco-civilization reform, air pollution, soil pollution, ozone-depleting substances, and climate change to illustrate the concept. To be clear, symbolic use of law and governance is present in any country, regardless of region or regime type. This Article's contribution is to shine a light on the ways in which symbolic reform works in China's authoritarian setting. Put another way, this is about the particular stories that the Chinese state tells about itself. At the same time, the findings here will be of interest to those concerned about the growing impact of information manipulation and populism on governance in the United States and other countries.