首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >Comparing the Clean Air Act and a Carbon Price
【24h】

Comparing the Clean Air Act and a Carbon Price

机译:比较《清洁空气法案》和碳价格

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the last half-decade, a variety of federal legislative proposals for limiting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have been put forward, most of which would set a price on carbon. As of early 2013, the one politically plausible policy appears to be a carbon tax, passed as part of a larger fiscal reform package. Meanwhile, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has begun regulating GHG emissions from a variety of sources using its authority under the Clean Air Act. It may be necessary to choose between these two policies, however. The Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill that failed in 2009 would have preempted much of this authority, and it appears likely that a carbon tax law would do the same. But how can one make this choice?
机译:在过去的十年中,已经提出了各种限制温室气体(GHG)排放的联邦立法提案,其中大多数将为碳定价。截至2013年初,这是一项政治上可行的政策,似乎是碳税,这是更大的财政改革方案的一部分。同时,美国环境保护局已开始根据《清洁空气法》授权其各种来源的温室气体排放。但是,可能有必要在这两个策略之间进行选择。瓦克斯曼·马基(Waxman-Markey)限额与贸易法案在2009年失败了,它将抢占大部分权力,而且碳税法似乎也可以这样做。但是,如何做出选择呢?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号