首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >Cooperative Federalism, Nutrients, and the Clean Water Act: Three Cases Revisited
【24h】

Cooperative Federalism, Nutrients, and the Clean Water Act: Three Cases Revisited

机译:合作联邦制,营养素和清洁水法:再审三个案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cooperative federalism varies widely from program to program, and depends on the relationship each statute prescribes. The Clean Water Act (CWA), while providing ample room for state participation, is heavily federal and leaves little about this relationship to chance. Nonetheless, the federal-state interplay goes on in as many venues as there are states and clean water programs, and the tensions that arise are inevitable. The cases discussed here raise three different aspects of CWA federalism: inaction by the federal partner, inaction by the state partner, and collaborative action by both partners that is also being challenged on grounds of cooperative federalism. These questions are not abstract. They affect the most uncontrolled form of water pollution in America, and three of the most iconic ecosystems on the continent.
机译:合作联邦制在各个计划之间差异很大,并且取决于每个法规所规定的关系。 《清洁水法》(CWA)虽然为州的参与提供了充足的空间,但它在很大程度上是联邦制的,对这种关系几乎没有任何把握。尽管如此,联邦与州之间的互动在各州和清洁水计划所涉及的尽可能多的地方进行,并且由此产生的紧张局势是不可避免的。这里讨论的案例提出了CWA联邦制的三个不同方面:联邦伙伴的不作为,州伙伴的不作为以及两个伙伴的合作行为,这也受到合作联邦主义的挑战。这些问题不是抽象的。它们影响了美国最不受控制的水污染形式,以及该大陆上最具标志性的三个生态系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号