首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >Unfounded Fears About Pollution Trading and Hotspots
【24h】

Unfounded Fears About Pollution Trading and Hotspots

机译:对污染交易和热点的毫无根据的恐惧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

EPA emissions inventory and cancer risk data for criteria pollutants and air toxics show clearly that vehicles and small stationary sources emit a majority of the air pollution nationally and account for most of the cancer risks from air toxics. Industrial sources, by contrast, rarely account for more than 10% of cumulative cancer risks from all outdoor sources of air toxics. The observed pattern of emissions is replicated at spatial scales ranging from census tracts to the nation as a whole. The secondary status of industrial facilities as sources of air pollution largely neutralizes the potential for pollution trading programs to cause hotspots. In the vast majority of jurisdictions, industrial emissions are simply too low, and in the few jurisdictions in which disparities cannot be ruled out, targeted policies exist to prevent them without compromising market efficiency. These findings are generalizable to all market-based regulations.
机译:EPA排放清单和标准污染物和空气毒物的癌症风险数据清楚地表明,车辆和小型固定污染源排放了全国大部分的空气污染,并占了空气毒物造成的大部分癌症风险。相比之下,工业来源很少占室外所有空气中有毒物质累积癌症风险的10%以上。观察到的排放模式在从人口普查范围到整个国家的空间尺度上得以复制。工业设施作为空气污染源的次要地位在很大程度上消除了污染交易计划引起热点的可能性。在绝大多数辖区中,工业排放量太低,而在不能排除差异的少数辖区中,有针对性的政策可以在不损害市场效率的情况下加以防止。这些发现可推广到所有基于市场的法规。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号