首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >Reliance Interests and Takings Liability for Rail-Trail Conversions: Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States
【24h】

Reliance Interests and Takings Liability for Rail-Trail Conversions: Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States

机译:铁路转换的信赖利益和责任:Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust诉美国

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On October 1, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in a relatively obscure case, Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States. On its face, the case involves an interpretation of the property rights created by the General Railroad Right of Way Act of 1875, which gave to any railroad, chartered by a state or territory, "[t]he right of way [200 feet wide] through the public lands of the United States." The 1875 Act was passed after a brief hiatus in congressional support for railroads following the era of lavish land grants between 1862 and 1871, in which over 94 million acres of public lands were given over to the transcontinental and other state-chartered railroads for sale to assist in financing the road's construction. Besides being an obscure case based on an equally obscure law, the procedural posture of the case is even more unusual, as the government prevailed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, and yet it supported the grant of certiorari.
机译:2013年10月1日,美国最高法院在相对模糊的案件Marvin M. Brandt可撤销信托v。从表面上看,此案涉及对1875年《通用铁路通行权法》所创造的财产权的解释,该法赋予任何由州或领地包租的铁路,“通行权[200英尺宽]通过美国的公共土地。”在1862年至1871年间获得大量土地赠款的时代之后,国会短暂支持铁路,此后通过了1875年法案,其中超过9400万英亩的公共土地被转让给了洲际和其他国家特许的铁路,以出售给协助为道路建设融资。除了基于同样晦涩的法律而产生的晦涩案件外,该案件的程序态势更为罕见,因为政府在美国第十巡回上诉法院获胜,但仍支持授予证书。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号