首页> 外文期刊>The Environmental Law Reporter >The Final Auer: How Weakening the Deference Doctrine May Impact Environmental Law
【24h】

The Final Auer: How Weakening the Deference Doctrine May Impact Environmental Law

机译:最后的审稿人:削弱教义主义如何影响环境法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Throughout the past decade, the United States Supreme Court has questioned the constitutionality of affording deference to a federal agency's interpretation of its own regulations. This level of deference originated with the Court's 1945 opinion in Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., and in 1997, the Court reinvigorated Seminole Rock in Auer v. Robbins. The impact of "Auer deference" has continued to grow with the expansion of the administrative state. But the intersection of a Supreme Court in flux with a presidential administration that has proposed major new environmental regulations may yet pose an opportunity for the Court to revisit this fundamental doctrine in administrative law.
机译:在过去的十年中,美国最高法院一直质疑遵守联邦机构对其自身法规的解释是否合宪。这种不同程度的尊重源自法院在1945年在Bowles诉塞米诺尔岩石与沙子公司中的意见,1997年,法院在Auer诉罗宾斯案中为塞米诺尔岩石重新注入了活力。随着行政国家的扩大,“ Auer尊严”的影响持续增长。但是,最高法院与提议了重大新环境法规的总统行政机构的交集可能仍为法院重新审视行政法中的这一基本原则提供了机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号