首页> 外文期刊>Environmental history >Restoring and Re-Restoring the Cheonggyecheon: Nature, Technology, and History in Seoul, South Korea
【24h】

Restoring and Re-Restoring the Cheonggyecheon: Nature, Technology, and History in Seoul, South Korea

机译:恢复和恢复清溪川:韩国首尔的自然,技术和历史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Cheonggyecheon Restoration Project (2003-5) was an ambitious urban initiative to restore a 5.8-kilometer stream in central Seoul by demolishing elevated highways and peeling back the decades-old concrete pavement. A massive civil engineering project in itself, the restoration work caused heated debates on whether it brought back "an environmentally friendly civic jewel'' or resulted in a humongous "fish tank'' with an artificial water supply and meticulously engineered vista. This article examines the design, implementation, and critique of the restoration project by taking an envirotechnical position that restoration is fundamentally about negotiating nature, technology, and history. First, the designers and engineers struggled to determine how much nature and how much technology should constitute the new Cheonggyecheon so that it could recover its original state. Second, planners and officials deliberated which parts of the city's past the restoration should reference and display. It turned out that a distant, dynastic era was brought back while a recent, contested history of rushed industrialization was pushed away, both physically and symbolically. Even as the critics of the restoration project pushed for a new "re-restoration'' project, the central dilemma of finding the right reference for restoration remained unresolved. The Cheonggyecheon project shows that restoration is a never-ending effort that mobilizes what is available at the moment in the repository of nature, technology, and history.
机译:清溪川修复项目(2003-5)是一项雄心勃勃的城市计划,目的是通过拆除高架公路并剥落已有数十年历史的混凝土路面来恢复首尔市中心5.8公里的溪流。修复工程本身就是一个庞大的土木工程项目,引起了关于是否带回“环保公民珠宝”还是造就了带有人工供水和精心设计的远景的巨大“鱼缸”的激烈辩论。本文通过采取环境技术立场来研究恢复项目的设计,实施和批评,该环境立场是恢复本质上是关于谈判自然,技术和历史的。首先,设计者和工程师们在努力确定新的清溪川应该构成多少自然和多少技术,以使其能够恢复其原始状态。其次,规划者和官员们考虑应参考和展示该城市过去的哪些部分。事实证明,一个遥远的王朝时代又回来了,而最近一个有争议的仓促工业化历史被从物理上和象征意义上推开了。尽管对修复项目的批评者们推动了新的“重新修复”项目,但仍未解决为修复找到合适参考的中心难题。目前处于自然,技术和历史资料库中。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental history》 |2019年第4期|736-765|共30页
  • 作者

    Jeon Chihyung; Kang Yeonsil;

  • 作者单位

    Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol Grad Sch Sci Technol & Policy Technol & Sci Technol & Soc STS Daejeon South Korea;

    Drexel Univ Philadelphia PA 19104 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号