首页> 外文期刊>Environmental forensics >Comparisons of ambient air particulates concentrations (TSP, PM_(2.5)) and dry depositions during smog and non-smog periods at Luliao, Shalu District sampling site
【24h】

Comparisons of ambient air particulates concentrations (TSP, PM_(2.5)) and dry depositions during smog and non-smog periods at Luliao, Shalu District sampling site

机译:沙鹿区采样点雾霾和非雾霾期大气颗粒物浓度(TSP,PM_(2.5))和干沉降的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The concentrations of ambient total suspended particulates (TSP) and PM2.5, and the dry depositions at a sample site at Luliao Junior High School (Luliao) in central Taiwan were measured during smog and non-smog days between December 2017 and July 2018. The results are compared to those obtained during non-smog periods in the years 2015-2017. The mean TSP and PM2.5 concentrations and dry deposition flux were 72.41 +/- 26.40, 41.88 +/- 23.51g/m(3), and 797.57 +/- 731.46g/m(2)min, respectively, on the smog days. The mean TSP and PM2.5 concentrations and dry deposition flux on the non-smog days were 56.39 +/- 18.08, 34.81 +/- 12.59g/m(3) and 468.93 +/- 600.57g/m(2)min, respectively. The mean TSP concentration in the smog period was 28% greater than that in the non-smog period, and the mean PM2.5 concentration was 20% higher. The mean dry deposition flux in the smog period was 70% higher than that in the non-smog period at Luliao. The PM2.5 concentrations exceeded the standards set by the Taiwan EPA (35g/m(3) daily, and 15g/m(3) annually). Therefore, the TSP and PM2.5 concentrations and dry deposition must be reduced in central Taiwan on smog days. In addition, atmospheric TSP and PM2.5 concentrations at various sampling sites were compared, and those herein were not higher than those measured in other countries. Finally, apart from the local traffic emissions, during smog periods, the other pollution source originated from the transportation process of traffic pollutants emitted in the northwest side of Taiwan.
机译:在2017年12月至2018年7月的雾霾天气和非雾霾天气期间,测量了台湾中部陆lia中学(六ul)采样地点周围总悬浮颗粒物(TSP)和PM2.5的浓度以及干沉降。将结果与2015-2017年非烟雾时期获得的结果进行比较。烟雾中的TSP和PM2.5平均浓度分别为72.41 +/- 26.40、41.88 +/- 23.51g / m(3)和797.57 +/- 731.46g / m(2)min天。无烟日的平均TSP和PM2.5浓度以及干沉降通量为56.39 +/- 18.08、34.81 +/- 12.59g / m(3)和468.93 +/- 600.57g / m(2)min,分别。烟雾时期的平均TSP浓度比非烟雾时期的平均TSP浓度高28%,而PM2.5的平均浓度则高20%。芦lia的雾期平均干沉降通量比非雾期高70%。 PM2.5的浓度超过了台湾环境保护局设定的标准(每天35g / m(3),每年15g / m(3))。因此,在雾霾天气中,台湾中部必须降低TSP和PM2.5的浓度以及干沉降。此外,比较了各个采样点的大气TSP和PM2.5浓度,此处的浓度不高于其他国家/地区中测得的浓度。最后,除了局部交通排放外,在雾霾时期,其他污染源还来自台湾西北侧排放的交通污染物的运输过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号