首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Education Research >A response to Scott's concerns about the relevance of environmental education research: applying social-ecological systems thinking and consilience to defining research goals
【24h】

A response to Scott's concerns about the relevance of environmental education research: applying social-ecological systems thinking and consilience to defining research goals

机译:回应斯科特对环境教育研究的相关性的担忧:运用社会生态系统的思想和一致性来确定研究目标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In William Scott's plenary address at the World Environmental Education Conference, he expressed concerns about the relevance of environmental education research in a world facing global environmental and demographic change. In responding to Scott's concerns, I argue that addressing challenges related to development and the environment requires examining EE goals at multiple levels as well as bridging diverse disciplines. I further suggest that integrating social-ecological systems and other approaches in environmental education research may provide a means for consilience among potentially divisive environmental education practice and research traditions. In so doing, I hope to spark debate about possibilities for an environmental education research agenda and learning organisation that spurs action relevant to concerns about the environment, individuals, and their communities.
机译:在威廉·斯科特(William Scott)在世界环境教育会议的全体会议上的讲话中,他对环境教育研究在面对全球环境和人口变化的世界中的相关性表示关切。在回应Scott的担忧时,我认为要解决与发展和环境相关的挑战,就需要在多个层面研究EE目标,并架起多种学科。我进一步建议,将社会生态系统和其他方法整合到环境教育研究中,可以为可能存在分歧的环境教育实践和研究传统之间的协调提供一种手段。通过这样做,我希望引发有关环境教育研究议程和学习组织的可能性的辩论,该组织会鼓励采取与对环境,个人及其社区的关注有关的行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号