首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Conservation >Who are the poor? Measuring wealth inequality to aid understanding of socioeconomic contexts for conservation: a case-study from the Solomon Islands
【24h】

Who are the poor? Measuring wealth inequality to aid understanding of socioeconomic contexts for conservation: a case-study from the Solomon Islands

机译:谁是穷人?衡量财富不平等状况,以帮助了解保护的社会经济背景:所罗门群岛的个案研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Understanding the local socioeconomic context is important for the design of appropriate conservation initiatives and associated monitoring strategies, especially in areas with high degrees of inequality, to ensure conservation interventions do not inadvertently further disadvantage vulnerable people. Typical assessments of wealth inequality in remote rural areas are constrained by limited engagement with a cash economy, complex family and tribal ties, and an absence of basic infrastructure. This paper presents a simple participatory approach to measure wealth inequality that does not predefine indicators, such, as income or assets, but allows the local people choose the most appropriate indicators. A case study from the Solomon Islands revealed poor households in Kahua were characterized by fewer members, fewer members of working age, and fewer male members than wealthier households. The poor also owned fewer of the locally defined indicators of wealth that were collectively correlated with limited land tenure, and, consequently, conservation or development initiatives that are tied to land in Kahua will be less likely to assist the poorest. Adopting this participatory approach could improve the effectiveness of community-based conservation, through facilitating opportunities to explore local poverty and routes for alleviation.
机译:了解当地的社会经济背景对于设计适当的保护措施和相关的监测策略非常重要,尤其是在高度不平等的地区,以确保保护措施不会无意中使弱势群体处于不利地位。偏远农村地区对财富不平等的典型评估受到现金经济参与有限,复杂的家庭和部落关系以及缺乏基本基础设施的制约。本文提出了一种衡量财富不平等的简单参与性方法,该方法并不预先定义指标(例如收入或资产),但允许当地人选择最合适的指标。所罗门群岛的一项案例研究显示,与富裕家庭相比,卡瓦县的贫困家庭成员人数较少,工作年龄成员较少,男性成员较少。穷人还拥有较少的当地定义的财富指标,这些指标与有限的土地保有权集体相关,因此,与卡瓦县土地相关的保护或发展计划将不太可能为最贫困的人提供帮助。采用这种参与性方法可以通过促进探索当地贫困和减轻贫困的途径的机会来提高社区保护的有效性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Conservation》 |2014年第4期|357-366|共10页
  • 作者单位

    University of St Andrews, North Street, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL, UK,Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK;

    Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK;

    University of St Andrews, North Street, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL, UK;

    School of Environment and the Centre for Environmental Change and Human Resilience, University of Dundee, Perth Road, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    conservation; Melanesia; monitoring; participatory; poverty; Solomon Islands;

    机译:保护;美拉尼西亚监控;参与性贫穷;所罗门群岛;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号