...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter - Cases >Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Env't v. Jewell
【24h】

Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Env't v. Jewell

机译:用餐公民反对破坏我们的环境诉珠宝

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Federal district court did not abuse its discretion in denying preliminary injunction in lawsuit brought by environmental groups alleging Bureau of Land Management violated National Environmental Policy Act in authorizing permits to drill in San Juan Basin, because: (1) groups needed to show they were likely to succeed on merits of their claims to be entitled to injunctive relief, (2) groups did not establish that new horizontal drilling and multi-stage fracturing techniques would lead to greater environmental impacts than those anticipated in 2003 resource management plan and environ- mental impact statement that BLM tiered its individual permit approval environmental assessment NEPA analysis to, (3) groups did not establish how impacts from new drilling and fracturing techniques would be qualitatively different from those of prior analyzed techniques, and (4) groups did not establish that continued approval of new wells impermissi-bly limited BLM's options as it amends 2003 RMP.
机译:联邦地方法院没有滥用其自由裁量权来否认环境团体提起的初步禁令,指控土地管理局在批准圣胡安盆地钻探许可证时违反了《国家环境政策法》,因为:(1)团体需要证明他们很可能为了成功行使其有权获得禁令性救济的主张,(2)小组没有确定新的水平钻井和多阶段压裂技术会比2003年资源管理计划和环境影响预期的环境影响更大。声明称BLM将其个人许可证审批环境评估NEPA分析分为以下几类:(3)组未确定新钻探和压裂技术的影响与先前分析过的技术在质量上有何不同,(4)组未建立持续性BLM修改2003 RMP时,批准新井的做法必然会限制BLM的选择。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter - Cases》 |2016年第8期|1544-1556|共13页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号