...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter - Cases >Tri-Realty Co. v. Ursinus Coll.
【24h】

Tri-Realty Co. v. Ursinus Coll.

机译:三房地产有限公司v。 Orsini Coll。

获取原文
           

摘要

The Court will grant in part and deny in part each of Ursinus's Motions for Summary Judgment. Subject to the limitations discussed above, the Court will grant summary judgment as to the RCRA claim, except with respect to four theories of liability: (1) that humans and animals may face an imminent and substantial en-dangerment as a result of intermittent exposure to contamination at College Arms; (2) that animals may face an imminent and substantial endangerment as a result of prolonged exposure to contamination at College Arms; (3) that humans may face an imminent and substantial endangerment as a result of the spread of contamination to locations at College Arms that might result in prolonged human exposure to contamination; and (4) that the environment "in and of itself" may be endangered. Additionally, and also subject to the limitations discussed above, the Court will grant summary judgment as to the CWA claim with respect to any theory of liability based on alleged discharges of pollution into the alleged wetlands, but deny summary judgment with respect to any theory of liability based on alleged discharges of pollution into the Lower Drainage Swale and/or Bum Hollow Run.
机译:法院将部分批准和部分拒绝Ursinus的即决判决动议。在上述限制的前提下,法院将就RCRA索赔作出即决判决,但以下四种赔偿责任理论除外:(1)由于间歇性暴露,人畜可能面临迫在眉睫的重大危险受到大学武器学院的污染; (2)由于长时间暴露在College Arms的污染下,动物可能面临迫在眉睫的威胁; (3)由于污染物传播到大学军械库的场所可能会导致人类面临长期迫在眉睫的威胁,这可能会导致人类长时间暴露在污染之下; (4)环境“本身”可能受到威胁。此外,在上述限制条件下,法院将基于对涉嫌排放到涉嫌湿地中的污染物排放的任何赔偿责任理论,对CWA索赔做出简易判决,但对任何有关捕捞理论的不予判决。根据所称排放到下排水沟和/或流浪汉沟的污染承担责任。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter - Cases》 |2016年第2016期|831-881|共51页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号